Andrew Louth

595 total papers · 3.7k total citations
78 papers, 451 citations indexed

About

Andrew Louth is a scholar working on Classics, Sociology and Political Science and Religious studies. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrew Louth has authored 78 papers receiving a total of 451 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 29 papers in Classics, 23 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 19 papers in Religious studies. Recurrent topics in Andrew Louth's work include Byzantine Studies and History (28 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (15 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (12 papers). Andrew Louth is often cited by papers focused on Byzantine Studies and History (28 papers), Biblical Studies and Interpretation (15 papers) and Historical and Linguistic Studies (12 papers). Andrew Louth collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom and Australia. Andrew Louth's co-authors include Gedaliahu G. Stroumsa, Jonathan Shepard, Pauline Allen, Hans Urs von Balthasar, Cunningham, Alistair Stewart-Sykes, Wendy Mayer, Anthony Meredith, John Riches and Lawrence I. Conrad and has published in prestigious journals such as The American Historical Review, Religious Studies and Numen.

In The Last Decade

Andrew Louth

42 papers receiving 278 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author						Papers	Cites
Andrew Louth	159	144	141	136	106	78	451
John Meyendorff	216 1.4×	81 0.6×	147 1.0×	103 0.8×	50 0.5×	54	456
Herbert Musurillo	105 0.7×	80 0.6×	84 0.6×	105 0.8×	138 1.3×	58	455
R. A. Markus	107 0.7×	171 1.2×	188 1.3×	69 0.5×	123 1.2×	68	548
W. H. C. Frend	150 0.9×	81 0.6×	149 1.1×	183 1.3×	222 2.1×	99	524
Rowan Williams	215 1.4×	124 0.9×	41 0.3×	139 1.0×	42 0.4×	74	472
Morton S. Enslin	203 1.3×	59 0.4×	83 0.6×	295 2.2×	159 1.5×	36	533
H. C. Erik Midelfort	82 0.5×	83 0.6×	54 0.4×	40 0.3×	48 0.5×	33	523
Bernhard W. Scholz	139 0.9×	44 0.3×	166 1.2×	57 0.4×	67 0.6×	25	493
David Frankfurter	112 0.7×	60 0.4×	59 0.4×	122 0.9×	289 2.7×	54	481
Carlos Μ. N. Eire	112 0.7×	72 0.5×	38 0.3×	69 0.5×	26 0.2×	28	421

Countries citing papers authored by Andrew Louth

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrew Louth's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrew Louth with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrew Louth more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrew Louth

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrew Louth. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrew Louth. The network helps show where Andrew Louth may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrew Louth

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrew Louth. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrew Louth based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrew Louth. Andrew Louth is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact