Mark Ravizza
- Philosophy top 0.2%
- War, Ethics, and Justification 12
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 3
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 2%
- Free Will and Agency 13
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 2
- Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations 1
- General Decision Sciences top 10%
- Safety Research top 5%
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 7
-
- Patient Dignity and Privacy 1
-
- Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints 1
Mark Ravizza
23 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 89
- Philosophy 946
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.2k
- General Decision Sciences 34
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 155
- Safety Research 79
Countries citing papers authored by Mark Ravizza
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Ravizza's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Ravizza with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Ravizza more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Ravizza
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Ravizza. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Ravizza. The network helps show where Mark Ravizza may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 7 scholars most cited alongside Mark Ravizza, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 3 | 2000 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2000 | 6 | |
| 5 | 2000 | 19 | |
| 6 | Précis of Responsibility and Control | 2000 | 1 |
| 7 | 2000 | 7 | |
| 8 | 2000 | 12 | |
| 9 | 1999 | 6 | |
| 10 | Morally responsible people without freedom | 1998 | 0 |
| 11 | Responsibility and Controlbreakdown → | 1998 | 1014 |
| 12 | 1996 | 9 | |
| 13 | 1995 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1994 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 32 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 22 | |
| 17 | 1992 | 15 | |
| 18 | 1992 | 5 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 74 | |
| 20 | 1991 | 35 |
About Mark Ravizza
Mark Ravizza is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, Religious studies and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 1.5k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Free Will and Agency (13 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (12 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (7 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (3 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (2 papers), Patient Dignity and Privacy (1 paper), Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints (1 paper) and Neuroethics, Human Enhancement, Biomedical Innovations (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (946 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.2k citations), General Decision Sciences (34 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (155 citations) and Safety Research (79 citations). Mark Ravizza has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include John Martin Fischer, Michael McKenna, David Copp, Alfred R. Mele, Eleonore Stump, Alison McIntyre and Michael E. Bratman. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Philosophical Review, Ethics, Journal of Social Philosophy and Philosophical Studies.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.