Quassim Cassam
- Philosophy top 0.5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 5%
- Co-authors
- John CampbellIan James KiddHeather BattalyVittorio BufacchiFathali M. MoghaddamMichael A. PetersMarek TesařC. A. J. Coady
- Topics
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (20 papers)Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers)Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Quassim Cassam
46 papers receiving 837 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 90
- Philosophy 571
- Sociology and Political Science 315
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 310
- Cognitive Neuroscience 299
- Political Science and International Relations 132
Countries citing papers authored by Quassim Cassam
This map shows the geographic impact of Quassim Cassam's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Quassim Cassam with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Quassim Cassam more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Quassim Cassam
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Quassim Cassam. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Quassim Cassam. The network helps show where Quassim Cassam may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Quassim Cassam
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Quassim Cassam. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Quassim Cassam based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Quassim Cassam. Quassim Cassam is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 5 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 49 | |
| 10 | Intellectual vice and self-awareness | 1 |
| 11 | Berkeley's puzzle | 15 |
| 12 | 46 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 16 | |
| 15 | 8 | |
| 16 | 53 | |
| 17 | 19 | |
| 18 | Self and World | 65 |
| 19 | 5 | |
| 20 | Kant and reductionism | 9 |
About Quassim Cassam
Quassim Cassam is a scholar working on Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 956 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (20 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (13 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (8 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (571 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (310 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (99 citations). Quassim Cassam has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include John Campbell, John Campbell, Ian James Kidd, Heather Battaly, Vittorio Bufacchi, Fathali M. Moghaddam, Michael A. Peters, Marek Tesař, C. A. J. Coady and Nenad Miščević. Their work appears in journals such as Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, The Philosophical Quarterly and Synthese.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.