Michael E. Bratman
- Philosophy top 0.05%
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 22
- Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics 12
- War, Ethics, and Justification 4
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 2
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 1%
- Free Will and Agency 15
- General Decision Sciences top 2%
-
- Philosophy and Theoretical Science 8
- History and Philosophy of Science top 0.5%
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 16
-
- Ethics in medical practice 4
Michael E. Bratman
75 papers receiving 5.0k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 146
- Philosophy 1.9k
- Cognitive Neuroscience 1.9k
- General Decision Sciences 127
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 814
- History and Philosophy of Science 209
Countries citing papers authored by Michael E. Bratman
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael E. Bratman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael E. Bratman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael E. Bratman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael E. Bratman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael E. Bratman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael E. Bratman. The network helps show where Michael E. Bratman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Michael E. Bratman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2022 | 3 | |
| 2 | 2018 | 25 | |
| 3 | Sich selbst ernst nehmen | 2016 | 3 |
| 4 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2009 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2007 | 70 | |
| 8 | 2006 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2004 | 10 | |
| 10 | 2003 | 29 | |
| 11 | 2003 | 24 | |
| 12 | 2000 | 20 | |
| 13 | 2000 | 5 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 24 | |
| 15 | 1996 | 50 | |
| 16 | 1992 | 166 | |
| 17 | 1986 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1981 | 14 | |
| 19 | 1979 | 35 | |
| 20 | 1978 | 0 |
About Michael E. Bratman
Michael E. Bratman is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience, Political Science and International Relations, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Safety Research, having authored 79 papers that have together received 5.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (22 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (16 papers), Free Will and Agency (15 papers), Epistemology, Ethics, and Metaphysics (12 papers), Philosophy and Theoretical Science (8 papers), Ethics in medical practice (4 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (4 papers) and Theology and Philosophy of Evil (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (1.9k citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (1.9k citations), General Decision Sciences (127 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (814 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (209 citations). Michael E. Bratman has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include J. David Velleman, Hugh J. McCann, David Israël, Martha E. Pollack, David Copp, Simon Blackburn, Irving Thalberg, James S. Taylor, Nomy Arpaly and Tom L. Beauchamp. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Review, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, Ethics, Philosophical Studies and Noûs.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.