Mark Power Smith

68 papers receiving 1.7k citations

Peers

Mark Power Smith
Comparison fields: 5 of 22
  • Condensed Matter Physics 885
  • Nuclear and High Energy Physics 218
  • Electrical and Electronic Engineering 176
  • Materials Chemistry 108
  • Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics 66
Replace Heikki I. Helava with:
Heikki I. Helava Russia
Eugenijus Gaubas Lithuania
Minho Kim South Korea
Rainer Sielemann Germany
B. Ya. Ber Russia
Juozas Vidmantis Vaitkus Lithuania
E. V. Kalinina Russia
Samir El Shawish Slovenia
H.‐E. Mahnke Germany
Wolfgang Witthuhn Germany
Mark Power Smith relative to Heikki I. Helava Russia Heikki I. Helava's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×3×3.9×
Heikki I. Helava · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Power Smith

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Power Smith's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Power Smith with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Power Smith more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Power Smith

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Power Smith. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Power Smith. The network helps show where Mark Power Smith may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Mark Power Smith, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Mark Power Smith Line = papers co-authored together Mark Power Smith links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 71 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2012188
2 1996170
3 1996120
4 2003101
5 199691
6 200091
7 199781
8 199571
9 200558
10 199657
11 199555
12 199753
13 199652
14 199751
15 199648
16 200746
17 199535
18 200432
19 199824
20 199523

About Mark Power Smith

Mark Power Smith is a scholar working on Condensed Matter Physics, Nuclear and High Energy Physics, Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Materials Chemistry and Biomedical Engineering, having authored 71 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials (19 papers), Magnetic confinement fusion research (12 papers), Silicon Carbide Semiconductor Technologies (8 papers), Fusion materials and technologies (4 papers), Superconducting Materials and Applications (3 papers), Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices (1 paper), Semiconductor materials and devices (1 paper) and Quantum and electron transport phenomena (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Condensed Matter Physics (885 citations), Nuclear and High Energy Physics (218 citations), Electrical and Electronic Engineering (176 citations), Materials Chemistry (108 citations) and Atomic and Molecular Physics, and Optics (66 citations). Mark Power Smith has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include H. X. Jiang, J.Y. Lin, G. D. Chen, Md Asif Khan, Hadis Morkoç, C. J. Sun, Andrei E. Botchkarev, Richard McMahon, Matthias Voelskow and Qiyu Chen. Their work appears in journals such as Applied Physics Letters, Fusion Engineering and Design, Journal of Applied Physics, Fusion Science & Technology and IEEE Transactions on Plasma Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact