Mark Philip Bradley

1.8k citations
45 papers · 903 indexed · h-index 12

Mark Philip Bradley

40 papers receiving 816 citations

Peers

Mark Philip Bradley
Comparison fields: 5 of 124
  • Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine 293
  • Molecular Biology 187
  • Organic Chemistry 172
  • Developmental Neuroscience 143
  • Surgery 132
Replace Brittany N. Davis with:
Brittany N. Davis United States
Anthony Fletcher United Kingdom
David L. Norton United Kingdom
K. H. Weis Germany
John B. Taylor United States
Thomas Hutchinson United States
Shanshan Zheng China
Do Young Choi South Korea
Ryo Watanabe Japan
Hans‐Georg Wolf Germany
Mark Philip Bradley relative to Brittany N. Davis United States Brittany N. Davis's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×7.8×
Brittany N. Davis · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Mark Philip Bradley

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark Philip Bradley's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark Philip Bradley with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark Philip Bradley more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark Philip Bradley

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark Philip Bradley. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark Philip Bradley. The network helps show where Mark Philip Bradley may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark Philip Bradley

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark Philip Bradley. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark Philip Bradley based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark Philip Bradley. Mark Philip Bradley is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 1
2 7
3 0
4
Age, technology prior experience and ease of use: Who's doing what?
2
5 7
6 1
7 17
8
Proceedings of SRR: Abstracts from the Society for Research in Rehabilitation summer meeting held at Weetwood Hall, Leeds, 3 and 4 July 2007
1
9 2
10 11
11
Truth claims : representation and human rights
64
12 375
13 173
14 3
15 6
16 68
17 1
18 19
19 1
20 9

About Mark Philip Bradley

Mark Philip Bradley is a scholar working on History and Philosophy of Science, Space and Planetary Science and Classics, having authored 45 papers that have together received 903 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Vietnamese History and Culture Studies (11 papers), Communism, Protests, Social Movements (4 papers) and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine (293 citations), Developmental Neuroscience (143 citations) and Critical Care and Intensive Care Medicine (106 citations). Mark Philip Bradley has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Ronald Palin, A. Bom, Helen Feilden, Alan W. Muir, J. van Egmond, John K. Clark, David C. Rees, Ming‐Qiang Zhang, E.J. MacLean and Patrice Petro. Their work appears in journals such as Angewandte Chemie International Edition, Chemical Communications and American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026