Mark O’Brien

458 total citations
28 papers, 256 citations indexed

About

Mark O’Brien is a scholar working on Education, Sociology and Political Science and General Health Professions. According to data from OpenAlex, Mark O’Brien has authored 28 papers receiving a total of 256 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 8 papers in Education, 6 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 4 papers in General Health Professions. Recurrent topics in Mark O’Brien's work include Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (4 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (3 papers) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (2 papers). Mark O’Brien is often cited by papers focused on Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (4 papers), Parental Involvement in Education (3 papers) and Innovative Education and Learning Practices (2 papers). Mark O’Brien collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Mark O’Brien's co-authors include Tünde Varga‐Atkins, Anne Qualter, David Whyte, Diana Burton, Anne Campbell, Peggy Tso, Johannes Wheeldon, Lisa Mckenzie, Louise Shaw and Joanne M. Jordan and has published in prestigious journals such as BMC Public Health, BMC Health Services Research and Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics.

In The Last Decade

Mark O’Brien

24 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mark O’Brien United Kingdom 9 122 85 42 23 22 28 256
Xavier Roegiers Belgium 10 132 1.1× 86 1.0× 25 0.6× 27 1.2× 9 0.4× 30 236
Sofia Nyström Sweden 12 190 1.6× 53 0.6× 85 2.0× 25 1.1× 63 2.9× 33 387
Jason Loh Singapore 5 119 1.0× 56 0.7× 26 0.6× 26 1.1× 9 0.4× 12 240
Kate Thomson Australia 10 248 2.0× 36 0.4× 49 1.2× 40 1.7× 27 1.2× 36 378
Tuija Turunen Finland 10 351 2.9× 74 0.9× 20 0.5× 49 2.1× 34 1.5× 33 465
Susan Tilley Canada 9 110 0.9× 108 1.3× 81 1.9× 9 0.4× 15 0.7× 15 291
Leon Benadé New Zealand 11 285 2.3× 65 0.8× 14 0.3× 22 1.0× 13 0.6× 49 379
Hazel Bines United Kingdom 9 186 1.5× 59 0.7× 28 0.7× 34 1.5× 14 0.6× 22 292
Sally Boyd 8 156 1.3× 36 0.4× 34 0.8× 29 1.3× 5 0.2× 35 261
Jean‐Marie Van der Maren Canada 8 156 1.3× 181 2.1× 41 1.0× 47 2.0× 11 0.5× 22 366

Countries citing papers authored by Mark O’Brien

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mark O’Brien's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark O’Brien with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark O’Brien more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mark O’Brien

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark O’Brien. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark O’Brien. The network helps show where Mark O’Brien may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mark O’Brien

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mark O’Brien. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mark O’Brien based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mark O’Brien. Mark O’Brien is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Gillespie, Duncan, Mark O’Brien, Nai Rui Chng, et al.. (2024). Reintroducing face-to-face support alongside remote support to form a hybrid stop smoking service in England: a formative mixed methods evaluation. BMC Public Health. 24(1). 718–718. 2 indexed citations
2.
Pope, Thomas, et al.. (2019). Government outsourcing: what has worked and what needs reform?. 14 indexed citations
3.
Mckenzie, Lisa, Louise Shaw, Joanne M. Jordan, et al.. (2019). Factors Influencing the Implementation of a Hospital-wide Intervention to Promote Professionalism and Build a Safety Culture: A Qualitative Study. The Joint Commission Journal on Quality and Patient Safety. 45(10). 694–705. 26 indexed citations
4.
O’Brien, Mark, et al.. (2017). Just Managing?. BiblioBoard Library Catalog (Open Research Library). 4 indexed citations
5.
O’Brien, Mark. (2016). Distributional impact assessments and the record of the Coalition Government: the tyranny of numbers without interpretation. Journal of Social Welfare and Family Law. 38(4). 413–429. 1 indexed citations
6.
Tso, Peggy, et al.. (2015). Diagrammatic Elicitation: Defining the Use of Diagrams in Data Collection. The Qualitative Report. 30 indexed citations
7.
O’Brien, Mark. (2013). Marcuse and the Language of Power. 16(1). 187–203. 2 indexed citations
8.
O’Brien, Mark. (2013). Repositioning the subject discipline for an ‘academic-enhancement’ model of widening participation: A philosophical sketch. Active Learning in Higher Education. 14(3). 241–250. 3 indexed citations
9.
O’Brien, Mark. (2012). The Liverpool Transport Strike of 1911: ‘Overcomings’, Transformations, and the ‘New Mentalities’ of the Liverpool Working Class. Historical Studies in Industrial Relations. 39–60. 1 indexed citations
10.
O’Brien, Mark, et al.. (2012). Cultural–historical activity theory and ‘the visual’ in research: exploring the ontological consequences of the use of visual methods. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 35(3). 251–268. 8 indexed citations
11.
O’Brien, Mark. (2011). Convergence at the surface; divergence beneath. Journal of Child Health Care. 15(4). 370–379. 1 indexed citations
12.
O’Brien, Mark, et al.. (2010). Engaging students in clinical Bacteriology: a fresh look. Microbiology Australia. 31(1). 41–43. 1 indexed citations
13.
Sun, Qin, et al.. (2009). Consumer perception of product stimuli: an investigation into Indian consumer psychology and its implications for NPD process and strategy. Journal of Veterinary Pharmacology and Therapeutics. 5(1). 77–81. 1 indexed citations
15.
Varga‐Atkins, Tünde & Mark O’Brien. (2009). From drawings to diagrams: maintaining researcher control during graphic elicitation in qualitative interviews. International Journal of Research & Method in Education. 32(1). 53–67. 46 indexed citations
16.
Varga‐Atkins, Tünde, Mark O’Brien, Diana Burton, Anne Campbell, & Anne Qualter. (2009). The importance of interplay between school-based and networked professional development: School professionals’ experiences of inter-school collaborations in learning networks. Journal of Educational Change. 11(3). 241–272. 11 indexed citations
17.
Clayton, Stephen, Mark O’Brien, Diana Burton, et al.. (2008). ‘I know it’s notproperresearch, but…’: how professionals’ understandings of research can frustrate its potential for CPD. Educational Action Research. 16(1). 73–84. 14 indexed citations
18.
O’Brien, Mark, Stephen Clayton, Tünde Varga‐Atkins, & Anne Qualter. (2008). Power and the theory-and-practice conundrum: the experience of doing research with a local authority. Evidence & Policy. 4(4). 371–390. 1 indexed citations
19.
O’Brien, Mark, Amanda Atkinson, Diana Burton, et al.. (2008). Social inclusion and learning networks: a ‘wider notion of learning’ or taking things in a different direction?. Research Papers in Education. 24(1). 57–75. 4 indexed citations
20.
O’Brien, Mark. (1994). Judges and the Deuteronomistic History. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026