Elizabeth Scanlon

28 total papers · 1.0k total citations
16 papers, 746 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth Scanlon is a scholar working on Surgery, Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth Scanlon has authored 16 papers receiving a total of 746 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Occupational Therapy and 4 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth Scanlon's work include Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (4 papers) and Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (4 papers). Elizabeth Scanlon is often cited by papers focused on Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (4 papers) and Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (4 papers). Elizabeth Scanlon collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and United States. Elizabeth Scanlon's co-authors include Magnus S. Ågren, Ursula Mirastschijski, A. B. G. Lansdown, Nicky Cullum, Yvonne Birks, E Andrea Nelson, Nikki Stubbs, David Leaper, R. Gary Sibbald and Patricia Price and has published in prestigious journals such as Quality of Life Research, FEMS Microbiology Letters and Wound Repair and Regeneration.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth Scanlon

15 papers receiving 709 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Elizabeth Scanlon 290 231 106 103 102 16 746
Nathan B. Menke 468 1.6× 184 0.8× 104 1.0× 95 0.9× 53 0.5× 21 898
Ben‐Shian Huang 344 1.2× 154 0.7× 151 1.4× 31 0.3× 66 0.6× 18 878
Jie Huang 408 1.4× 170 0.7× 288 2.7× 46 0.4× 261 2.6× 34 906
Joel Gil 439 1.5× 116 0.5× 94 0.9× 76 0.7× 47 0.5× 25 907
Joy Nolte Fong 331 1.1× 165 0.7× 58 0.5× 74 0.7× 74 0.7× 23 859
Terry E. Wright 245 0.8× 238 1.0× 80 0.8× 48 0.5× 109 1.1× 24 753
Wanda Dorsett‐Martin 323 1.1× 348 1.5× 101 1.0× 38 0.4× 57 0.6× 23 823
Zainab Ahmadian 267 0.9× 121 0.5× 315 3.0× 28 0.3× 216 2.1× 25 834
David Parsons 422 1.5× 184 0.8× 169 1.6× 79 0.8× 130 1.3× 21 828
Elnaz Shaabani 279 1.0× 39 0.2× 167 1.6× 46 0.4× 188 1.8× 13 794

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Scanlon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Scanlon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Scanlon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Scanlon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Scanlon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Scanlon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Scanlon. The network helps show where Elizabeth Scanlon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Scanlon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Scanlon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Scanlon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Scanlon. Elizabeth Scanlon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026