Elizabeth Scanlon

1.0k total citations
17 papers, 752 citations indexed

About

Elizabeth Scanlon is a scholar working on Surgery, Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation. According to data from OpenAlex, Elizabeth Scanlon has authored 17 papers receiving a total of 752 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Surgery, 4 papers in Occupational Therapy and 4 papers in Rehabilitation. Recurrent topics in Elizabeth Scanlon's work include Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (4 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (4 papers) and Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers). Elizabeth Scanlon is often cited by papers focused on Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (4 papers), Diagnosis and Treatment of Venous Diseases (4 papers) and Wound Healing and Treatments (4 papers). Elizabeth Scanlon collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Denmark and United States. Elizabeth Scanlon's co-authors include A. B. G. Lansdown, Ursula Mirastschijski, Magnus S. Ågren, Nicky Cullum, E Andrea Nelson, Yvonne Birks, Nikki Stubbs, David Leaper, Bo Jørgensen and Patricia Price and has published in prestigious journals such as Blood, Quality of Life Research and FEMS Microbiology Letters.

In The Last Decade

Elizabeth Scanlon

15 papers receiving 714 citations

Peers

Elizabeth Scanlon
Elizabeth Scanlon
Citations per year, relative to Elizabeth Scanlon Elizabeth Scanlon (= 1×) peers Marcel Nani Leite

Countries citing papers authored by Elizabeth Scanlon

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Elizabeth Scanlon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Elizabeth Scanlon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Elizabeth Scanlon more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Elizabeth Scanlon

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Elizabeth Scanlon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Elizabeth Scanlon. The network helps show where Elizabeth Scanlon may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Elizabeth Scanlon

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Elizabeth Scanlon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Elizabeth Scanlon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Elizabeth Scanlon. Elizabeth Scanlon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

17 of 17 papers shown
2.
Scanlon, Elizabeth, Flavian D. Brown, Andy Tu, et al.. (2022). 1332 Anti-CD161 antibody IMT-009 is a novel immunotherapeutic agent that reinvigorates T and NK cell function and anti-tumor efficacy through blocking interaction of CD161 with its ligand CLEC2D. Regular and Young Investigator Award Abstracts. A1383–A1383. 1 indexed citations
3.
Phillippi‐Falkenstein, Kathrine, et al.. (2008). Modification of a common BAL technique to enhance sample diagnostic value.. PubMed. 47(5). 47–51. 15 indexed citations
4.
Lansdown, A. B. G., et al.. (2007). Zinc in wound healing: Theoretical, experimental, and clinical aspects. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 15(1). 2–16. 474 indexed citations
5.
Thornton, Jeremy, et al.. (2006). The ammonia channel protein AmtB from Escherichia coli is a polytopic membrane protein with a cleavable signal peptide. FEMS Microbiology Letters. 258(1). 114–120. 17 indexed citations
6.
Jørgensen, Bo, Patricia Price, Klaus E. Andersen, et al.. (2005). The silver‐releasing foam dressing, Contreet Foam, promotes faster healing of critically colonised venous leg ulcers: a randomised, controlled trial. International Wound Journal. 2(1). 64–73. 106 indexed citations
7.
Scanlon, Elizabeth, et al.. (2005). Cost‐effective faster wound healing with a sustained silver‐releasing foam dressing in delayed healing leg ulcers – a health‐economic analysis. International Wound Journal. 2(2). 150–160. 24 indexed citations
9.
Scanlon, Elizabeth. (2005). Wound infection and colonisation. Nursing Standard. 19(24). 57–67. 7 indexed citations
10.
Scanlon, Elizabeth. (2005). The Literacy Experiences Of Ninth-graders And Their Teacher In An English Language Arts Workshop. Journal of International Crisis and Risk Communication Research. 1 indexed citations
11.
Scanlon, Elizabeth. (2005). Wound infection and colonisation. Nursing Standard. 19(24). 57–67. 1 indexed citations
12.
Scanlon, Elizabeth & Nikki Stubbs. (2004). Pressure ulcer risk assessment in patients with darkly pigmented skin.. PubMed. 19(6). 339–41. 12 indexed citations
13.
Scanlon, Elizabeth, et al.. (2003). PHL5 HEALTH ECONOMIC ANALYSIS OF A SILVER CONTAINING HYDROACTIVATED FOAM DRESSING IN DELAYED HEALING LEG ULCERS. Value in Health. 6(6). 741–741. 1 indexed citations
14.
Scanlon, Elizabeth & Nikki Stubbs. (2002). To use or not to use? The debate on the use of antiseptics in wound care. British Journal of Community Nursing. 7(Sup2). 8–20. 7 indexed citations
15.
Scanlon, Elizabeth, et al.. (2002). Benchmarking pressure ulcers. Nursing Standard. 16(22). 50–60. 3 indexed citations
16.
Scanlon, Elizabeth, et al.. (2002). Benchmarking pressure ulcers. Nursing Standard. 16(22). 50–60. 2 indexed citations
17.
Scanlon, Elizabeth. (1992). Do Cancers Invade Veins?. Archives of Surgery. 127(4). 389–389. 2 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026