Richard Searle
- Rehabilitation top 0.5%
- Surgery
- Occupational Therapy top 1%
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism top 10%
- Biomaterials top 10%
- Co-authors
- Christina LindholmCaroline DowsettKeith G HardingMichael StaceyKeith MooreValerie C. HendersonFiona DownieJackie Stephen‐Haynes
- Topics
- Wound Healing and Treatments (15 papers)Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (12 papers)Surgical site infection prevention (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Richard Searle
25 papers receiving 671 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 97
- Rehabilitation 484
- Surgery 270
- Occupational Therapy 199
- Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism 148
- Biomaterials 137
Countries citing papers authored by Richard Searle
This map shows the geographic impact of Richard Searle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Richard Searle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Richard Searle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Richard Searle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Richard Searle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Richard Searle. The network helps show where Richard Searle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Richard Searle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Richard Searle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Richard Searle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Richard Searle. Richard Searle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | 4 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 13 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 1 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | Wound management for the 21st century: combining effectiveness and efficiencybreakdown → | 368 |
| 12 | 39 | |
| 13 | 11 | |
| 14 | 45 | |
| 15 | Putting patients first: Reducing the human and economic costs of wounds | 15 |
| 16 | 17 | |
| 17 | 13 | |
| 18 | 25 | |
| 19 | 75 | |
| 20 | 4 |
About Richard Searle
Richard Searle is a scholar working on Occupational Therapy, Rehabilitation and Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, having authored 26 papers that have together received 697 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Wound Healing and Treatments (15 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (12 papers) and Surgical site infection prevention (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Rehabilitation (484 citations), Occupational Therapy (199 citations) and Biomaterials (137 citations). Richard Searle has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Christina Lindholm, Caroline Dowsett, Keith G Harding, Michael Stacey, Keith Moore, Valerie C. Henderson, Fiona Downie, Jackie Stephen‐Haynes, Chris Roberts and Jameel Nazir. Their work appears in journals such as AIChE Journal, Journal of Hospital Infection and Value in Health.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.