Dot Weir

1.2k total citations · 1 hit paper
24 papers, 659 citations indexed

About

Dot Weir is a scholar working on Rehabilitation, Surgery and Occupational Therapy. According to data from OpenAlex, Dot Weir has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 659 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 16 papers in Rehabilitation, 13 papers in Surgery and 11 papers in Occupational Therapy. Recurrent topics in Dot Weir's work include Wound Healing and Treatments (16 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (11 papers) and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (10 papers). Dot Weir is often cited by papers focused on Wound Healing and Treatments (16 papers), Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (11 papers) and Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (10 papers). Dot Weir collaborates with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Dot Weir's co-authors include Robert S. Kirsner, Gregory S. Schultz, Geoffrey C. Gurtner, Paul Y. Liu, David G. Armstrong, John C Lantis, G. W. Gibbons, Manuela Martins‐Green, Rica Tanaka and Elof Eriksson and has published in prestigious journals such as Wound Repair and Regeneration, International Wound Journal and Advances in Wound Care.

In The Last Decade

Dot Weir

22 papers receiving 632 citations

Hit Papers

Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus 2022 2026 2023 2024 2022 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Dot Weir United States 11 450 195 188 143 98 24 659
Henrik Sönnergren Sweden 7 557 1.2× 167 0.9× 158 0.8× 156 1.1× 197 2.0× 9 797
Caroline Pang Sweden 2 539 1.2× 147 0.8× 151 0.8× 155 1.1× 197 2.0× 3 734
Alan A Rogers United Kingdom 13 396 0.9× 199 1.0× 152 0.8× 97 0.7× 78 0.8× 34 536
Mark G Rippon United Kingdom 16 549 1.2× 309 1.6× 242 1.3× 109 0.8× 137 1.4× 62 826
Donna Cartwright United States 4 668 1.5× 249 1.3× 267 1.4× 248 1.7× 173 1.8× 6 1.0k
Marcia Nusgart United States 5 684 1.5× 253 1.3× 282 1.5× 269 1.9× 173 1.8× 7 973
Richard Searle United Kingdom 12 484 1.1× 270 1.4× 199 1.1× 148 1.0× 137 1.4× 26 697
Sandeep Dhall United States 15 322 0.7× 147 0.8× 82 0.4× 113 0.8× 105 1.1× 22 692
Elizabeth Scanlon United Kingdom 8 294 0.7× 232 1.2× 105 0.6× 78 0.5× 107 1.1× 17 752
Nadia Ayoub United Kingdom 5 524 1.2× 380 1.9× 376 2.0× 193 1.3× 65 0.7× 7 794

Countries citing papers authored by Dot Weir

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Dot Weir's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dot Weir with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dot Weir more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Dot Weir

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dot Weir. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dot Weir. The network helps show where Dot Weir may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dot Weir

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dot Weir. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dot Weir based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Dot Weir. Dot Weir is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Hsia, Henry C., Elof Eriksson, Geoffrey C. Gurtner, et al.. (2025). Management of Diabetic Wounds: Expert Panel Consensus Statement. Advances in Wound Care. 616315066–616315066.
2.
Dissemond, Joachim, Paul Chadwick, Dot Weir, et al.. (2024). M.O.I.S.T. Concept for the Local Therapy of Chronic Wounds: An International Update. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 2163494887–2163494887. 5 indexed citations
3.
Olutoye, Oluyinka O., Elof Eriksson, Robert S. Kirsner, et al.. (2024). Management of Acute Wounds—Expert Panel Consensus Statement. Advances in Wound Care. 13(11). 553–583. 8 indexed citations
4.
Klein, Robert J., et al.. (2024). Use of Silver Collagen Oxidized Regenerated Cellulose Dressings in Conjunction With Negative Pressure Wound Therapy: Expert Panel Consensus Recommendations. WOUNDS A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice. 36(8). 263–273. 1 indexed citations
5.
Mallow, Peter J., Joyce Black, Abigail E. Chaffin, et al.. (2024). The Economic and Quality Effects of Wound Cleansing With Pure Hypochlorous Acid: Evidence-Based Evaluation and Clinical Experience. WOUNDS A Compendium of Clinical Research and Practice. 36(10). S1–S13.
6.
Beeckman, Dimitri, Matthew M. Cooper, Robert J. Klein, et al.. (2023). The role community‐based healthcare providers play in managing hard‐to‐heal wounds. International Wound Journal. 21(1). e14402–e14402. 12 indexed citations
7.
Eriksson, Elof, Paul Y. Liu, Gregory S. Schultz, et al.. (2022). Chronic wounds: Treatment consensus. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 30(2). 156–171. 220 indexed citations breakdown →
8.
Swanson, Terry, Karen Ousey, Emily Haesler, et al.. (2022). IWII Wound Infection in Clinical Practice consensus document: 2022 update. Journal of Wound Care. 31(Sup12). S10–S21. 69 indexed citations
9.
Bernatchez, Stéphanie F., et al.. (2021). Venous Leg Ulcers: A Review of Published Assessment and Treatment Algorithms. Advances in Wound Care. 11(1). 28–41. 18 indexed citations
10.
Percival, Steven L., Dieter Mayer, Robert S. Kirsner, et al.. (2019). Surfactants: Role in biofilm management and cellular behaviour. International Wound Journal. 16(3). 753–760. 54 indexed citations
11.
Kirsner, Robert S., David J. Margolis, Baldur Tumi Baldursson, et al.. (2019). Fish skin grafts compared to human amnion/chorion membrane allografts: A double‐blind, prospective, randomized clinical trial of acute wound healing. Wound Repair and Regeneration. 28(1). 75–80. 52 indexed citations
12.
Woo, Kevin, Kimberly LeBlanc, Gregory Schultz, et al.. (2019). Technological features of advanced skin protectants and an examination of the evidence base. Journal of Wound Care. 28(2). 110–125. 9 indexed citations
13.
Moore, Zena, Caroline Dowsett, Glenn Smith, et al.. (2019). TIME CDST: an updated tool to address the current challenges in wound care. Journal of Wound Care. 28(3). 154–161. 31 indexed citations
14.
Schultz, Gregory S., Kevin Woo, Dot Weir, & Qingping Yang. (2018). Effectiveness of a monofilament wound debridement pad at removing biofilm and slough:ex vivoand clinical performance. Journal of Wound Care. 27(2). 80–90. 21 indexed citations
15.
Weir, Dot. (2014). How to... Top tips for wound dressing selection. 1 indexed citations
16.
Snyder, Robert, Vickie R. Driver, Caroline E. Fife, et al.. (2011). Using a diagnostic tool to identify elevated protease activity levels in chronic and stalled wounds: a consensus panel discussion.. PubMed. 57(12). 36–46. 35 indexed citations
17.
Sibbald, R. Gary, D Krasner, James A. Lutz, et al.. (2009). SCALE: Skin Changes at Life's End.. PubMed. 21(12). 329–36. 4 indexed citations
18.
Schwartzfarb, Elissa M., et al.. (2008). Pyoderma Gangrenosum in a Patient with Bruton's X-linked Agammaglobulinemia: Shared Pathogenesis of Altered Tumor Necrosis Factor Alpha?. PubMed. 1(1). 26–9. 9 indexed citations
19.
Gray, Mikel, et al.. (2007). Moisture vs Pressure. Journal of Wound Ostomy and Continence Nursing. 34(2). 134–142. 30 indexed citations
20.
O’Moore, R. R., et al.. (1978). Diet and heart disease. BMJ. 1(6121). 1213.3–1213. 6 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026