Kate Springett

647 total citations
24 papers, 462 citations indexed

About

Kate Springett is a scholar working on Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, Rehabilitation and Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. According to data from OpenAlex, Kate Springett has authored 24 papers receiving a total of 462 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 11 papers in Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, 7 papers in Rehabilitation and 7 papers in Orthopedics and Sports Medicine. Recurrent topics in Kate Springett's work include Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (11 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (7 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (5 papers). Kate Springett is often cited by papers focused on Diabetic Foot Ulcer Assessment and Management (11 papers), Wound Healing and Treatments (7 papers) and Pressure Ulcer Prevention and Management (5 papers). Kate Springett collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malta and Australia. Kate Springett's co-authors include Simon Otter, Ann Moore, A. Young, Karen Walker‐Bone, Kevin Davies, Jan Jensen, Mohamed Sakel, Vanessa Abrahamson, Liz Cheek and Kevin Lucas and has published in prestigious journals such as Disability and Rehabilitation, Nurse Education Today and Clinical Rheumatology.

In The Last Decade

Kate Springett

22 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Kate Springett United Kingdom 11 150 108 92 89 79 24 462
Matthew Carroll New Zealand 14 118 0.8× 168 1.6× 55 0.6× 119 1.3× 12 0.2× 58 458
Fábio Jennings Brazil 17 201 1.3× 336 3.1× 130 1.4× 36 0.4× 63 0.8× 33 863
Aline Mizusaki Imoto Brazil 15 94 0.6× 151 1.4× 30 0.3× 13 0.1× 39 0.5× 37 547
Derek Santos United Kingdom 12 22 0.1× 80 0.7× 70 0.8× 69 0.8× 16 0.2× 56 388
Johan von Heideken Sweden 14 78 0.5× 45 0.4× 26 0.3× 12 0.1× 242 3.1× 35 583
Cristiano Sena Conceição Brazil 12 17 0.1× 167 1.5× 23 0.3× 23 0.3× 58 0.7× 24 557
W.F. Peter Netherlands 17 499 3.3× 57 0.5× 65 0.7× 15 0.2× 48 0.6× 57 921
Andrew D. Beischer Australia 18 47 0.3× 397 3.7× 11 0.1× 69 0.8× 137 1.7× 28 795
Mette Harreby Denmark 11 114 0.8× 88 0.8× 52 0.6× 4 0.0× 25 0.3× 17 866
Pooya Hosseinzadeh United States 14 32 0.2× 172 1.6× 9 0.1× 38 0.4× 143 1.8× 118 722

Countries citing papers authored by Kate Springett

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Springett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Springett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Springett more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Springett

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Springett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Springett. The network helps show where Kate Springett may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kate Springett

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kate Springett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kate Springett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kate Springett. Kate Springett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mizzi, Stephen, Ian Swaine, & Kate Springett. (2022). Is in-Shoe Microclimate a Neglected Contributor in the Pathway to Diabetic Foot Ulceration?. The International Journal of Lower Extremity Wounds. 24(2). 283–287. 2 indexed citations
2.
Woznitza, N., et al.. (2018). Increasing radiology capacity within the lung cancer pathway: centralised work‐based support for trainee chest X‐ray reporting radiographers. Journal of Medical Radiation Sciences. 65(3). 200–208. 11 indexed citations
3.
Falzon, Owen, et al.. (2018). A Novel Method to Determine Dynamic Temperature Trends Applied to In-Shoe Temperature Data During Walking. PubMed. 2018. 3958–3961. 1 indexed citations
4.
Abrahamson, Vanessa, Jan Jensen, Kate Springett, & Mohamed Sakel. (2016). Experiences of patients with traumatic brain injury and their carers during transition from in-patient rehabilitation to the community: a qualitative study. Disability and Rehabilitation. 39(17). 1683–1694. 78 indexed citations
5.
Springett, Kate, et al.. (2015). An exploration of role model influence on adult nursing students’ professional development: A phenomenological research study. Nurse Education Today. 37. 66–70. 48 indexed citations
6.
Upton, Dominic, et al.. (2013). Diabetes, pain and its consequences: Reflections from the MHC-sponsored symposium at the DFSG conference.. Research Explorer (The University of Manchester). 16(1). 1 indexed citations
7.
Otter, Simon, K. Lucas, Kate Springett, et al.. (2010). Comparison of foot pain and foot care among rheumatoid arthritis patients taking and not taking anti-TNFα therapy: an epidemiological study. Rheumatology International. 31(11). 1515–1519. 21 indexed citations
8.
Otter, Simon, Kevin Lucas, Kate Springett, et al.. (2009). Foot pain in rheumatoid arthritis prevalence, risk factors and management: an epidemiological study. Clinical Rheumatology. 29(3). 255–271. 150 indexed citations
9.
Springett, Kate, et al.. (2007). A clinical longitudinal evaluation of pre-fabricated, semi-rigid foot orthoses prescribed to improve foot function. The Foot. 17(4). 184–189. 9 indexed citations
10.
Springett, Kate, et al.. (2004). A clinical study and the National Service Framework for diabetes. Journal of Tissue Viability. 14(4). 124–132. 7 indexed citations
11.
Otter, Simon, Kate Springett, Kevin Lucas, et al.. (2004). The role of outcome measures in assessing change in the at-risk rheumatoid foot. Journal of Tissue Viability. 14(4). 137–141. 1 indexed citations
12.
Springett, Kate, Michael F. Whiting, & C Marriott. (2003). Epidemiology of plantar forefoot corns and callus, and the influence of dominant side. The Foot. 13(1). 5–9. 16 indexed citations
13.
Springett, Kate. (2002). The impact of diabetes on wound management. Nursing Standard. 16(30). 72–80. 1 indexed citations
14.
Springett, Kate. (2002). Introduction to some common cutaneous foot conditions and their management. Journal of Tissue Viability. 12(3). 100–107.
15.
Springett, Kate & Richard White. (2002). Skin changes in the ‘at risk’ foot and their treatment. British Journal of Community Nursing. 7(Sup3). 25–32. 5 indexed citations
16.
Springett, Kate. (2000). Foot ulceration in diabetic patients. Nursing Standard. 14(26). 65–71. 1 indexed citations
17.
Rippon, Mark G, et al.. (1999). Ultrasound evaluation of acute experimental and chronic clinical wounds. Skin Research and Technology. 5(4). 228–236. 10 indexed citations
18.
Rippon, Mark G, et al.. (1998). Ultrasound assessment of skin and wound tissue: comparison with histology. Skin Research and Technology. 4(3). 147–154. 42 indexed citations
19.
Springett, Kate, et al.. (1997). Treatment of Corns, calluses and heel fissures with a hydrocolloid dressing. 52(7). 102–104. 4 indexed citations
20.
Springett, Kate & Sarah Greaves. (1995). Case Study A multidisciplinary approach to prevent foot ulceration. Journal of Tissue Viability. 5(1). 32–33. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026