Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Implementing TIMERS: the race against hard-to-heal wounds
2019199 citationsLeanne Atkin, Christine Moffatt et al.Journal of Wound Careprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Leanne Atkin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Leanne Atkin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Leanne Atkin more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Leanne Atkin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Leanne Atkin. The network helps show where Leanne Atkin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Leanne Atkin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Leanne Atkin.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Leanne Atkin based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Leanne Atkin. Leanne Atkin is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Fletcher, Jacqui, et al.. (2020). Learning from COVID-19: Developing a more efficient tissue viability service. Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield). 16(3). 77–81.1 indexed citations
Blackburn, Joanna, et al.. (2018). Exploring and understanding challenges in clinical practice: appropriate dressing wear time. Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield). 14(5). 56–64.11 indexed citations
10.
Atkin, Leanne, et al.. (2018). Diabetic foot ulceration: The impact of oedema. Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield). 14(1). 33–39.1 indexed citations
Rippon, Mark G, Karen Ousey, Alan A Rogers, & Leanne Atkin. (2016). Wound hydration versus maceration: understanding the differences. Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield). 12(3). 62–68.7 indexed citations
13.
Robinson, Linda, et al.. (2016). Evaluation of an automated ankle brachial pressure index calculator in a nurse-led leg ulcer clinic. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield). 12(2). 80–87.3 indexed citations
Atkin, Leanne, et al.. (2015). Foam dressings: a review of the literature and evaluation of fluid-handling capacity of four leading foam dressings. Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield). 11(1). 75–81.6 indexed citations
16.
Ousey, Karen, et al.. (2015). Exploring the role of the Tissue Viability Nurse. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).4 indexed citations
17.
Ousey, Karen, et al.. (2014). The changing role of the tissue viability nurse: an exploration of this multifaceted post. Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield).8 indexed citations
18.
Atkin, Leanne. (2013). Wound assessment in primary care. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield).
19.
Hemingway, Steve, Leanne Atkin, & John Stephenson. (2013). Assessing and managing wounds in mental health settings. Huddersfield Research Portal (University of Huddersfield). 9(3). 34–40.10 indexed citations
20.
Ousey, Karen, Leanne Atkin, & Richard White. (2013). Superabsorbent wound dressings: A literature review. University of Huddersfield Repository (University of Huddersfield). 9(3). 52–60.11 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.