Otto Waris

830 citations
22 papers · 516 · h-index 13

Impact in

Papers in

Otto Waris

21 papers receiving 503 citations

Peers

Otto Waris
Comparison fields: 5 of 99
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 251
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 250
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 108
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 11
  • Applied Psychology 27
Replace Eric C. Fields with:
Eric C. Fields United States
Barbara Studer-Luethi Switzerland
Ruth Ogden United Kingdom
Benny Salo Finland
Ethan M. McCormick United States
Rotem Leshem Israel
José Ramón Alameda Bailén Spain
Rosalie P. Kern United States
Matthew E. Sachs United States
Laura Visu‐Petra Romania
Otto Waris relative to Eric C. Fields United States Eric C. Fields's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Eric C. Fields · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Otto Waris

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Otto Waris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otto Waris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otto Waris more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Otto Waris

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otto Waris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otto Waris. The network helps show where Otto Waris may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Otto Waris, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Otto Waris Line = papers co-authored together Otto Waris links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019104
2 201850
3 201942
4 201942
5 201536
6 201734
7 202031
8 201725
9 201824
10 201723
11 202013
12 202013
13 201412
14 201812
15 202111
16 201310
17 20219
18 20209
19 20206
20 20176

About Otto Waris

Otto Waris is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Social Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 516 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (14 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (2 papers) and Phonetics and Phonology Research (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (251 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (250 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (108 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (11 citations) and Applied Psychology (27 citations). Otto Waris has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Sweden and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Matti Laine, Anna Soveri, Minna Lehtonen, Karolina M. Lukasik, Daniel Fellman, Jussi Jylkkä, Susanne M. Jaeggi, Aaron R. Seitz, Juha Salmi and Linnéa Karlsson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Scientific Reports and Journal of Medical Internet Research.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact