Otto Waris

850 citations
22 papers · 540 · h-index 14

Impact in

Papers in

Otto Waris

21 papers receiving 527 citations

Peers

Otto Waris
Comparison fields: 5 of 93
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 239
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 229
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 108
  • Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology 9
  • Applied Psychology 21
Replace Megan E. Speer with:
Megan E. Speer United States
Jennifer K. MacCormack United States
Benny Salo Finland
Barbara Studer-Luethi Switzerland
Rotem Leshem Israel
Ruth Ogden United Kingdom
Matthew E. Sachs United States
Ethan M. McCormick United States
Rosalie P. Kern United States
María Soledad Segretin Argentina
Otto Waris relative to Megan E. Speer United States Megan E. Speer's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.1×
Megan E. Speer · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Otto Waris

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Otto Waris's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Otto Waris with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Otto Waris more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Otto Waris

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Otto Waris. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Otto Waris. The network helps show where Otto Waris may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Otto Waris, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Otto Waris Line = papers co-authored together Otto Waris links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 22 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2019107
2 201852
3 201946
4 201944
5 201537
6 201734
7 202033
8 201826
9 201725
10 201724
11 202014
12 202014
13 202113
14 201813
15 201412
16 202110
17 202010
18 201310
19 20206
20 20176

About Otto Waris

Otto Waris is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Cognitive Neuroscience, Developmental and Educational Psychology, Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine and Clinical Psychology, having authored 22 papers that have together received 540 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cognitive Abilities and Testing (14 papers), Cognitive Functions and Memory (8 papers), Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies (7 papers), Mental Health Research Topics (3 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (2 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (1 paper), Educational and Psychological Assessments (1 paper) and Memory Processes and Influences (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (239 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (229 citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (108 citations), Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology (9 citations) and Applied Psychology (21 citations). Otto Waris has collaborated with scholars based in Finland, Sweden and Norway. Frequent co-authors include Matti Laine, Anna Soveri, Karolina M. Lukasik, Minna Lehtonen, Daniel Fellman, Jussi Jylkkä, Susanne M. Jaeggi, Aaron R. Seitz, Juha Salmi and Hasse Karlsson. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Frontiers in Psychology, Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, Journal of Medical Internet Research and Scientific Reports.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact