Mark C. Murphy
- Philosophy top 1%
- Theology and Philosophy of Evil 15
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought 8
- Philosophical Ethics and Theory 7
- Medieval Philosophy and Theology 5
-
- Political Philosophy and Ethics 6
- American Constitutional Law and Politics 5
- Religious studies top 5%
- Biblical Studies and Interpretation 4
- Law top 5%
-
- Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies 4
- Co-authors
- Robert C. SolomonWalter Sinnott‐ArmstrongDonald C. HubinWilliam Lane CraigRichard SwinburneLouise AntonyJohn HarePhilip Soper
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Mark C. Murphy
40 papers receiving 385 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Philosophy 287
- Political Science and International Relations 138
- Religious studies 29
- Law 49
- Cognitive Neuroscience 83
Countries citing papers authored by Mark C. Murphy
This map shows the geographic impact of Mark C. Murphy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mark C. Murphy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mark C. Murphy more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mark C. Murphy
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mark C. Murphy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mark C. Murphy. The network helps show where Mark C. Murphy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Mark C. Murphy, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2023 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 3 | The natural law tradition in ethics | 2019 | 7 |
| 4 | 2019 | 7 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 0 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 30 | |
| 8 | 2011 | 19 | |
| 9 | 2010 | 0 | |
| 10 | Philosophy of law | 2007 | 3 |
| 11 | 2004 | 3 | |
| 12 | 2003 | 12 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2001 | 1 | |
| 15 | Natural Law and Practical Rationality | 2001 | 83 |
| 16 | 1997 | 1 | |
| 17 | 1997 | 5 | |
| 18 | 1997 | 8 | |
| 19 | 1995 | 2 | |
| 20 | Deviant Uses of "Obligation" in Hobbes' "Leviathan" | 1994 | 4 |
About Mark C. Murphy
Mark C. Murphy is a scholar working on Philosophy, Religious studies, Political Science and International Relations, Law and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 49 papers that have together received 472 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Theology and Philosophy of Evil (15 papers), Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (8 papers), Philosophical Ethics and Theory (7 papers), Political Philosophy and Ethics (6 papers), Medieval Philosophy and Theology (5 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (5 papers), Multicultural Socio-Legal Studies (4 papers) and Biblical Studies and Interpretation (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (287 citations), Political Science and International Relations (138 citations), Religious studies (29 citations), Law (49 citations) and Cognitive Neuroscience (83 citations). Mark C. Murphy has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Robert C. Solomon, Walter Sinnott‐Armstrong, Donald C. Hubin, William Lane Craig, Richard Swinburne, Louise Antony, John Hare, Philip Soper, Jeremy Waldron and A. John Simmons. Their work appears in journals such as Faith and Philosophy, Religious Studies, Ethics, Social Philosophy and Policy and American Catholic Philosophical Quarterly.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.