Robert C. Bartlett
- Philosophy top 5%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Topics
- Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (6 papers)Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers)Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Robert C. Bartlett
19 papers receiving 250 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 81
- Philosophy 93
- Political Science and International Relations 85
- Sociology and Political Science 67
- Social Psychology 44
- Clinical Psychology 34
Countries citing papers authored by Robert C. Bartlett
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert C. Bartlett's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert C. Bartlett with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert C. Bartlett more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert C. Bartlett
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert C. Bartlett. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert C. Bartlett. The network helps show where Robert C. Bartlett may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert C. Bartlett
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert C. Bartlett. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert C. Bartlett based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Robert C. Bartlett. Robert C. Bartlett is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 9 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 4 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 153 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 0 | |
| 9 | Souls without Longing. | 3 |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | Various Thoughts on the Occasion of a Comet | 14 |
| 15 | Action and Contemplation: Studies in the Moral and Political Thought of Aristotle | 16 |
| 16 | The Shorter Socratic Writings Apology of Socrates to the Jury, Oeconomicus, and Symposium: Translations, with Interpretive Essays and Notes | 1 |
| 17 | 0 | |
| 18 | 5 | |
| 19 | 13 | |
| 20 | 24 |
About Robert C. Bartlett
Robert C. Bartlett is a scholar working on Philosophy, Development and Religious studies, having authored 24 papers that have together received 298 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Seventeenth-Century Political and Philosophical Thought (6 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (5 papers) and Philosophical Ethics and Theory (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (93 citations), Political Science and International Relations (85 citations) and Research and Theory (3 citations). Robert C. Bartlett has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Susan D. Collins, Aristotle , Pierre Bayle, Geoff Goodman, Mary P. Nichols and Xénophon. Their work appears in journals such as American Political Science Review, American Journal of Political Science and Physical Therapy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.