Daniel Statman
- Philosophy top 1%
- War, Ethics, and Justification 24
-
- Global Peace and Security Dynamics 11
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Free Will and Agency 11
- Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment 6
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Torture, Ethics, and Law 17
- Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies 7
- Religion and Society Interactions 4
-
- Religious Freedom and Discrimination 5
- Co-authors
- Avi ŚagiYitzhak BenbajiStephen de WijzeRaanan Sulitzeanu‐KenanAyman K. AgbariaMicha MandelRonen AvrahamJulia Elad‐Strenger
- Partner nations
- IsraelUnited KingdomGermany
In The Last Decade
Daniel Statman
53 papers receiving 392 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
- Philosophy 225
- Political Science and International Relations 160
- Cognitive Neuroscience 114
- Sociology and Political Science 213
- General Decision Sciences 6
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel Statman
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel Statman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel Statman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel Statman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel Statman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel Statman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel Statman. The network helps show where Daniel Statman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 9 scholars most cited alongside Daniel Statman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2022 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 7 | 2013 | 1 | |
| 8 | 2012 | 1 | |
| 9 | 2012 | 2 | |
| 10 | Moral Tragedies, Supreme Emergencies and National Defense | 2006 | 3 |
| 11 | 2005 | 7 | |
| 12 | 2004 | 13 | |
| 13 | 2003 | 6 | |
| 14 | 2000 | 65 | |
| 15 | 1997 | 40 | |
| 16 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 17 | Divine Command Morality and Jewish Tradition | 1995 | 11 |
| 18 | 1994 | 4 | |
| 19 | 1992 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1990 | 4 |
About Daniel Statman
Daniel Statman is a scholar working on Philosophy, Political Science and International Relations, Law, Space and Planetary Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 55 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include War, Ethics, and Justification (24 papers), Torture, Ethics, and Law (17 papers), Free Will and Agency (11 papers), Global Peace and Security Dynamics (11 papers), Jewish and Middle Eastern Studies (7 papers), Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment (6 papers), Religious Freedom and Discrimination (5 papers) and Religion and Society Interactions (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (225 citations), Political Science and International Relations (160 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (114 citations), Sociology and Political Science (213 citations) and General Decision Sciences (6 citations). Daniel Statman has collaborated with scholars based in Israel, United Kingdom and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Avi Śagi, Yitzhak Benbaji, Stephen de Wijze, Raanan Sulitzeanu‐Kenan, Ayman K. Agbaria, Micha Mandel, Ronen Avraham, Julia Elad‐Strenger and Thomas Kessler. Their work appears in journals such as Law and Philosophy, Ethics, Ratio, Philosophical Psychology and Journal of Applied Philosophy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.