Andrews Reath

73 total papers · 3.3k total citations
23 papers, 571 citations indexed

About

Andrews Reath is a scholar working on Philosophy, Cognitive Neuroscience and Political Science and International Relations. According to data from OpenAlex, Andrews Reath has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 571 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Philosophy, 5 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience and 2 papers in Political Science and International Relations. Recurrent topics in Andrews Reath's work include Philosophical Ethics and Theory (12 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (7 papers) and Free Will and Agency (5 papers). Andrews Reath is often cited by papers focused on Philosophical Ethics and Theory (12 papers), War, Ethics, and Justification (7 papers) and Free Will and Agency (5 papers). Andrews Reath collaborates with scholars based in United States. Andrews Reath's co-authors include Immanuel Kant, Barbara Herman, John Rawls, Christine M. Korsgaard, Jens Timmermann, Stefano Bacin, Pauline Kleingeld, Stephen Engstrom, Eric Watkins and Heiner F. Klemme and has published in prestigious journals such as The Philosophical Review, Noûs and Ethics.

In The Last Decade

Andrews Reath

20 papers receiving 481 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Andrews Reath 389 179 157 85 38 23 571
Elizabeth Harman 277 0.7× 106 0.6× 231 1.5× 73 0.9× 55 1.4× 30 537
Jens Timmermann 452 1.2× 188 1.1× 249 1.6× 62 0.7× 31 0.8× 37 607
John Skorupski 333 0.9× 176 1.0× 169 1.1× 156 1.8× 31 0.8× 58 636
Seana Valentine Shiffrin 239 0.6× 192 1.1× 228 1.5× 127 1.5× 50 1.3× 36 573
Warren Quinn 386 1.0× 137 0.8× 330 2.1× 118 1.4× 106 2.8× 14 670
Geoffrey Sayre‐McCord 355 0.9× 106 0.6× 241 1.5× 85 1.0× 49 1.3× 35 506
Toni Rønnow‐Rasmussen 461 1.2× 115 0.6× 313 2.0× 62 0.7× 31 0.8× 30 625
Francis Hutcheson 211 0.5× 148 0.8× 104 0.7× 141 1.7× 11 0.3× 25 558
James Lenman 453 1.2× 105 0.6× 332 2.1× 61 0.7× 58 1.5× 37 570
Nomy Arpaly 444 1.1× 86 0.5× 434 2.8× 92 1.1× 76 2.0× 24 699

Countries citing papers authored by Andrews Reath

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Andrews Reath's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Andrews Reath with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Andrews Reath more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Andrews Reath

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Andrews Reath. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Andrews Reath. The network helps show where Andrews Reath may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Andrews Reath

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Andrews Reath. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Andrews Reath based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Andrews Reath. Andrews Reath is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026