Michael Pakaluk
- Philosophy top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Social Psychology
- Political Science and International Relations
- Anthropology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Joseph PriceGiles PearsonA. A. LongKlaus CorciliusSusan Sauvé MeyerChristopher ShieldsIakovos Vasiliou
- Topics
- Classical Philosophy and Thought (12 papers)Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers)Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanada
In The Last Decade
Michael Pakaluk
22 papers receiving 198 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 60
- Philosophy 107
- Sociology and Political Science 59
- Social Psychology 34
- Political Science and International Relations 30
- Anthropology 27
Countries citing papers authored by Michael Pakaluk
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael Pakaluk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael Pakaluk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael Pakaluk more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael Pakaluk
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael Pakaluk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael Pakaluk. The network helps show where Michael Pakaluk may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael Pakaluk
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael Pakaluk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael Pakaluk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Michael Pakaluk. Michael Pakaluk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 32 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | Dependence on God and Man: Toward a Catholic Constitution of Liberty | 1 |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 0 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | 11 | |
| 10 | The great question of practical truth, and a diminutive answer | 2 |
| 11 | The Ultimate Final Argument | 2 |
| 12 | 1 | |
| 13 | On an Alleged Contradiction in Aristotle's Nicomachean Ethics | 4 |
| 14 | 5 | |
| 15 | Aristotle: Nicomachean Ethics, Books VIII and IX | 17 |
| 16 | 4 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | Other selves : philosophers on friendship | 52 |
About Michael Pakaluk
Michael Pakaluk is a scholar working on Philosophy, Gender Studies and Demography, having authored 28 papers that have together received 256 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Classical Philosophy and Thought (12 papers), Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (3 papers) and Family Dynamics and Relationships (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Philosophy (107 citations), Religious studies (18 citations) and Anthropology (27 citations). Michael Pakaluk has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Canada. Frequent co-authors include Joseph Price, Giles Pearson, A. A. Long, Klaus Corcilius, Susan Sauvé Meyer, Christopher Shields and Iakovos Vasiliou. Their work appears in journals such as The Philosophical Quarterly, Economic Inquiry and Marriage & Family Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.