Mário Pinto

617 total citations
32 papers, 403 citations indexed

About

Mário Pinto is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Statistics and Probability and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Mário Pinto has authored 32 papers receiving a total of 403 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Cognitive Neuroscience, 14 papers in Statistics and Probability and 5 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Mário Pinto's work include Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (14 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (13 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (12 papers). Mário Pinto is often cited by papers focused on Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (14 papers), Visual perception and processing mechanisms (13 papers) and Spatial Neglect and Hemispheric Dysfunction (12 papers). Mário Pinto collaborates with scholars based in Italy, United States and Switzerland. Mário Pinto's co-authors include Fabrizio Doricchi, Stefano Lasaponara, Michele Pellegrino, Marilena Aiello, Francesco Tomaiuolo, Vera Sigre‐Leirós, Dina Alves, Sara G. Alves, Sheila Merola and Vincenzo Cestari and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, Cognition and Neuropsychologia.

In The Last Decade

Mário Pinto

27 papers receiving 400 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Mário Pinto Italy 13 281 168 79 62 56 32 403
Andria Shimi United Kingdom 10 213 0.8× 44 0.3× 80 1.0× 100 1.6× 32 0.6× 21 377
Mark C. Price Norway 12 290 1.0× 45 0.3× 118 1.5× 230 3.7× 11 0.2× 20 485
Venera Gashaj Switzerland 10 87 0.3× 135 0.8× 269 3.4× 33 0.5× 142 2.5× 18 431
Melissa M. Kibbe United States 14 220 0.8× 113 0.7× 300 3.8× 86 1.4× 115 2.1× 46 504
Hannah E. Roome United Kingdom 7 118 0.4× 128 0.8× 155 2.0× 85 1.4× 83 1.5× 16 296
Delia Pigat Sweden 6 249 0.9× 31 0.2× 93 1.2× 81 1.3× 107 1.9× 7 341
Danielle Hoffmann Luxembourg 9 103 0.4× 291 1.7× 148 1.9× 41 0.7× 154 2.8× 17 337
John P. Garza United States 10 231 0.8× 26 0.2× 74 0.9× 68 1.1× 56 1.0× 14 351
Cora Titz Germany 5 187 0.7× 55 0.3× 147 1.9× 175 2.8× 43 0.8× 14 362
María Marta Richard’s Argentina 10 97 0.3× 43 0.3× 73 0.9× 63 1.0× 120 2.1× 53 294

Countries citing papers authored by Mário Pinto

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Mário Pinto's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mário Pinto with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mário Pinto more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Mário Pinto

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mário Pinto. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mário Pinto. The network helps show where Mário Pinto may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mário Pinto

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mário Pinto. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mário Pinto based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mário Pinto. Mário Pinto is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Pinto, Mário, Laura Monti, Daniela Pia Rosaria Chieffo, et al.. (2025). Gender Differences in Alexithymia, Emotion Regulation, and Impulsivity in Young Individuals with Mood Disorders. Journal of Clinical Medicine. 14(6). 2030–2030. 1 indexed citations
2.
Pinto, Mário, et al.. (2024). The time course of the spatial representation of ‘past’ and ‘future’ concepts: New evidence from the STEARC effect. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 86(3). 1048–1055.
3.
Pinto, Mário, et al.. (2023). How time gets spatial: factors determining the stability and instability of the mental time line. Attention Perception & Psychophysics. 85(7). 2321–2336. 4 indexed citations
4.
Lasaponara, Stefano, Mário Pinto, David Conversi, et al.. (2023). Temperament and probabilistic predictive coding in visual-spatial attention. Cortex. 171. 60–74. 2 indexed citations
5.
Pellegrino, Michele, et al.. (2021). Perceiving numerosity does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention. Experimental Brain Research. 239(10). 3023–3034. 4 indexed citations
6.
Lasaponara, Stefano, Mário Pinto, Marilena Aiello, et al.. (2021). Individual EEG profiling of attention deficits in left spatial neglect: A pilot study. Neuroscience Letters. 761. 136097–136097. 6 indexed citations
7.
Pinto, Mário, Michele Pellegrino, Stefano Lasaponara, et al.. (2021). Number space is made by response space: Evidence from left spatial neglect. Neuropsychologia. 154. 107773–107773. 10 indexed citations
8.
Pinto, Mário, et al.. (2020). How to trigger and keep stable directional Space–Number Associations (SNAs). Cortex. 134. 253–264. 19 indexed citations
9.
Lasaponara, Stefano, Mário Pinto, Michele Pellegrino, et al.. (2020). Spatial uncertainty improves the distribution of visual attention and the availability of sensory information for conscious report. Experimental Brain Research. 238(9). 2031–2040. 1 indexed citations
10.
Lasaponara, Stefano, et al.. (2020). Pre-motor deficits in left spatial neglect: An EEG study on Contingent Negative Variation (CNV) and response-related beta oscillatory activity. Neuropsychologia. 147. 107572–107572. 6 indexed citations
11.
Pellegrino, Michele, Mário Pinto, Stefano Lasaponara, et al.. (2019). The Attentional-SNARC effect 16 years later: no automatic space–number association (taking into account finger counting style, imagery vividness, and learning style in 174 participants). Experimental Brain Research. 237(10). 2633–2643. 15 indexed citations
13.
Lasaponara, Stefano, Mário Pinto, Marilena Aiello, Francesco Tomaiuolo, & Fabrizio Doricchi. (2019). The Hemispheric Distribution of α-Band EEG Activity During Orienting of Attention in Patients with Reduced Awareness of the Left Side of Space (Spatial Neglect). Journal of Neuroscience. 39(22). 4332–4343. 31 indexed citations
14.
Pinto, Mário, et al.. (2018). Visualising numerals: An ERPs study with the attentional SNARC task. Cortex. 101. 1–15. 19 indexed citations
15.
Lasaponara, Stefano, Mário Pinto, Domenica Bueti, et al.. (2018). EEG Correlates of Preparatory Orienting, Contextual Updating, and Inhibition of Sensory Processing in Left Spatial Neglect. Journal of Neuroscience. 38(15). 3792–3808. 27 indexed citations
16.
Aiello, Marilena, Sheila Merola, Stefano Lasaponara, et al.. (2017). The influence of visual and phonological features on the hemispheric processing of hierarchical Navon letters. Neuropsychologia. 109. 75–85. 3 indexed citations
17.
Lasaponara, Stefano, et al.. (2017). Expectancy modulates pupil size during endogenous orienting of spatial attention. Cortex. 102. 57–66. 15 indexed citations
18.
Lasaponara, Stefano, et al.. (2017). Changes in predictive cuing modulate the hemispheric distribution of the P1 inhibitory response to attentional targets. Neuropsychologia. 99. 156–164. 20 indexed citations
19.
Merola, Sheila, et al.. (2015). Dissociation between line bisection and mental-number-line bisection in healthy adults. Neuropsychologia. 75. 565–576. 27 indexed citations
20.
Pinto, Mário, et al.. (2015). Perceiving numbers does not cause automatic shifts of spatial attention. Cortex. 73. 298–316. 39 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026