Mario Fenech
About
In The Last Decade
Mario Fenech
4 papers receiving 342 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Plant Science 223
- Molecular Biology 127
- Biochemistry 73
- Nutrition and Dietetics 59
- Food Science 47
Countries citing papers authored by Mario Fenech
This map shows the geographic impact of Mario Fenech's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Mario Fenech with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Mario Fenech more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Mario Fenech
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Mario Fenech. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Mario Fenech. The network helps show where Mario Fenech may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Mario Fenech
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Mario Fenech. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Mario Fenech based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Mario Fenech. Mario Fenech is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 56 | |
| 5 | Vitamin C Content in Fruits: Biosynthesis and Regulation breakdown → | 259 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.