Maria Schweer‐Collins
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- General Health Professions
- Demography top 10%
- Co-authors
- Martiño Rodríguez‐GonzálezEmily E. Tanner‐SmithMariana V. MartinsRichard SaitzPaul LanierRafael Jódar AnchíaElizabeth A. SkowronErkan Işık
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers)Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (8 papers)Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSpainPortugal
In The Last Decade
Maria Schweer‐Collins
24 papers receiving 245 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
- Clinical Psychology 131
- Social Psychology 108
- Sociology and Political Science 53
- General Health Professions 45
- Demography 34
Countries citing papers authored by Maria Schweer‐Collins
This map shows the geographic impact of Maria Schweer‐Collins's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Maria Schweer‐Collins with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Maria Schweer‐Collins more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Maria Schweer‐Collins
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Maria Schweer‐Collins. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Maria Schweer‐Collins. The network helps show where Maria Schweer‐Collins may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Maria Schweer‐Collins
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Maria Schweer‐Collins. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Maria Schweer‐Collins based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Maria Schweer‐Collins. Maria Schweer‐Collins is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 2 | |
| 5 | 2 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 53 | |
| 13 | 4 | |
| 14 | 14 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 20 | |
| 17 | 4 | |
| 18 | 6 | |
| 19 | 6 | |
| 20 | 9 |
About Maria Schweer‐Collins
Maria Schweer‐Collins is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Safety Research and Social Psychology, having authored 27 papers that have together received 251 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (14 papers), Attachment and Relationship Dynamics (8 papers) and Child Abuse and Trauma (7 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (131 citations), Social Psychology (108 citations) and Applied Psychology (17 citations). Maria Schweer‐Collins has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Spain and Portugal. Frequent co-authors include Martiño Rodríguez‐González, Emily E. Tanner‐Smith, Mariana V. Martins, Richard Saitz, Paul Lanier, Rafael Jódar Anchía, Elizabeth A. Skowron, Erkan Işık, Sofia Major and Leslie D. Leve. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology and Clinical Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.