María Rubio‐Aparicio
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Social Psychology top 10%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Co-authors
- Julio Sánchez‐MecaJosé A López-LópezFulgencio Marín‐MartínezJuan J. Madrid‐ValeroIrene PortillaVioleta Clement‐CarbonellLaura Badenes‐RiberaJosé Antonio López Pina
- Topics
- Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (8 papers)Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (7 papers)Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomNetherlands
In The Last Decade
María Rubio‐Aparicio
44 papers receiving 1.0k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 143
- Clinical Psychology 328
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 232
- Social Psychology 148
- Cognitive Neuroscience 133
- Psychiatry and Mental health 123
Countries citing papers authored by María Rubio‐Aparicio
This map shows the geographic impact of María Rubio‐Aparicio's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by María Rubio‐Aparicio with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites María Rubio‐Aparicio more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by María Rubio‐Aparicio
This network shows the impact of papers produced by María Rubio‐Aparicio. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by María Rubio‐Aparicio. The network helps show where María Rubio‐Aparicio may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of María Rubio‐Aparicio
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of María Rubio‐Aparicio. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of María Rubio‐Aparicio based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with María Rubio‐Aparicio. María Rubio‐Aparicio is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 9 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 0 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | 3 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 67 | |
| 12 | 79 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 18 | |
| 15 | 5 | |
| 16 | 33 | |
| 17 | NEUROTICISMO E IDEAS SUICIDAS: UN ESTUDIO META-ANALÍTICO | 5 |
| 18 | 17 | |
| 19 | 55 | |
| 20 | Desarrollo de un modelo basado en servicios digitales comunes reutilizables para gobierno electrónico | 0 |
About María Rubio‐Aparicio
María Rubio‐Aparicio is a scholar working on Statistics, Probability and Uncertainty, Aging and Clinical Psychology, having authored 51 papers that have together received 1.0k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meta-analysis and systematic reviews (8 papers), Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (7 papers) and Suicide and Self-Harm Studies (6 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (232 citations), Applied Psychology (91 citations) and Clinical Psychology (328 citations). María Rubio‐Aparicio has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and Netherlands. Frequent co-authors include Julio Sánchez‐Meca, José A López-López, Fulgencio Marín‐Martínez, Juan J. Madrid‐Valero, Irene Portilla, Violeta Clement‐Carbonell, Laura Badenes‐Ribera, José Antonio López Pina, Matteo Angelo Fabris and Claudio Longobardi. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, The Science of The Total Environment and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.