Suzanne Cosh
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 5%
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Phillip J. TullyShona CrabbBernhard T. BauneHarald BaumeisterCatherine HelmerCécile DelcourtAmanda LeCouteurPeter Cheung
- Topics
- Sport Psychology and Performance (13 papers)Cardiac Health and Mental Health (10 papers)Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaPLoS ONEClinical Psychology Review
- Partner nations
- AustraliaFranceUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Suzanne Cosh
78 papers receiving 1.7k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 129
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 451
- Social Psychology 353
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 344
- Clinical Psychology 280
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 218
Countries citing papers authored by Suzanne Cosh
This map shows the geographic impact of Suzanne Cosh's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Suzanne Cosh with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Suzanne Cosh more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Suzanne Cosh
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Suzanne Cosh. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Suzanne Cosh. The network helps show where Suzanne Cosh may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Suzanne Cosh
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Suzanne Cosh. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Suzanne Cosh based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Suzanne Cosh. Suzanne Cosh is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 5 | |
| 6 | 22 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 4 | |
| 9 | 4 | |
| 10 | 0 | |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | 7 | |
| 13 | 2 | |
| 14 | 2 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 36 | |
| 18 | 108 | |
| 19 | 18 | |
| 20 | 16 |
About Suzanne Cosh
Suzanne Cosh is a scholar working on Applied Microbiology and Biotechnology, Applied Psychology and Clinical Psychology, having authored 88 papers that have together received 1.7k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Sport Psychology and Performance (13 papers), Cardiac Health and Mental Health (10 papers) and Eating Disorders and Behaviors (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (344 citations), Sensory Systems (116 citations) and Applied Psychology (105 citations). Suzanne Cosh has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, France and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Phillip J. Tully, Shona Crabb, Bernhard T. Baune, Harald Baumeister, Catherine Helmer, Cécile Delcourt, Amanda LeCouteur, Peter Cheung, Nathan J. Harrison and Christophe Tzourio. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Clinical Psychology Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.