Marc Teignier
Impact in
- Gender Studies top 5%
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics
-
- Global trade and economics
Papers in
-
- Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics 8
-
- Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth 5
- Labor market dynamics and wage inequality 4
- Firm Innovation and Growth 3
- Economic Growth and Productivity 2
Marc Teignier
13 papers receiving 344 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 42
- Gender Studies 151
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 89
- Economics and Econometrics 237
- Management of Technology and Innovation 43
- Business and International Management 12
Countries citing papers authored by Marc Teignier
This map shows the geographic impact of Marc Teignier's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marc Teignier with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marc Teignier more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Marc Teignier
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marc Teignier. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marc Teignier. The network helps show where Marc Teignier may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 4 scholars most cited alongside Marc Teignier, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2023 | 2 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 0 | |
| 4 | 2019 | 0 | |
| 5 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 6 | 2018 | 20 | |
| 7 | Macroeconomic Costs of Gender Gaps in a Model With Entrepreneurship and Household Production : the Case of Mexico | 2018 | 2 |
| 8 | 2017 | 5 | |
| 9 | 2017 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2017 | 14 | |
| 11 | 2017 | 79 | |
| 12 | 2016 | 126 | |
| 13 | How Costly are Labor Gender Gaps? Estimates for the Balkans and Turkey | 2015 | 1 |
| 14 | 2015 | 9 | |
| 15 | 2013 | 118 | |
| 16 | 2009 | 20 |
About Marc Teignier
Marc Teignier is a scholar working on Gender Studies, Economics and Econometrics, Management of Technology and Innovation, General Economics, Econometrics and Finance and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, having authored 16 papers that have together received 398 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Gender, Labor, and Family Dynamics (8 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers), Labor market dynamics and wage inequality (4 papers), Family Business Performance and Succession (3 papers), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (3 papers), Firm Innovation and Growth (3 papers), Global trade and economics (2 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (151 citations), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (89 citations), Economics and Econometrics (237 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (43 citations) and Business and International Management (12 citations). Marc Teignier has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include David Cuberes, Achim Schmillen, Nicolas Coeurdacier and Ana María Muñoz Boudet. Their work appears in journals such as Review of Development Economics, The B E Journal of Macroeconomics, Journal of Development Economics, The Review of Economic Studies and Journal of Human Capital.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.