Brian McCaig
- Economics and Econometrics top 2%
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Strategy and Management
- Accounting top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nina PavcnikThanasis StengosLoren BrandtDwayne BenjaminAdonis YatchewMargaret McMillanRobert KaestnerAlejandro N. Flores
- Topics
- Global trade and economics (7 papers)Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers)Income, Poverty, and Inequality (4 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Brian McCaig
18 papers receiving 537 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 56
- Economics and Econometrics 400
- General Economics, Econometrics and Finance 263
- Sociology and Political Science 155
- Strategy and Management 55
- Accounting 54
Countries citing papers authored by Brian McCaig
This map shows the geographic impact of Brian McCaig's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Brian McCaig with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Brian McCaig more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Brian McCaig
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Brian McCaig. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Brian McCaig. The network helps show where Brian McCaig may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Brian McCaig
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Brian McCaig. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Brian McCaig based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Brian McCaig. Brian McCaig is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 10 | |
| 6 | Trade Liberalization and Labor Market Adjustment in Botswana | 1 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 140 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 52 | |
| 12 | 66 | |
| 13 | International Trade and Household Businesses: Evidence from Vietnam | 1 |
| 14 | 142 | |
| 15 | 57 | |
| 16 | 11 | |
| 17 | 73 | |
| 18 | 2 |
About Brian McCaig
Brian McCaig is a scholar working on General Economics, Econometrics and Finance, Public Administration and Economics and Econometrics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 585 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Global trade and economics (7 papers), Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (5 papers) and Income, Poverty, and Inequality (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (263 citations), Economics and Econometrics (400 citations) and Development (25 citations). Brian McCaig has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Nina Pavcnik, Thanasis Stengos, Loren Brandt, Dwayne Benjamin, Adonis Yatchew, Margaret McMillan, Robert Kaestner, Alejandro N. Flores, Eric V. Edmonds and Chester C. Watson. Their work appears in journals such as American Economic Review, Journal of International Economics and Economics Letters.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.