Review of Development Economics

1.6k papers and 23.7k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.6k papers published in Review of Development Economics in the last decades have received a total of 23.7k indexed citations. Papers published in Review of Development Economics usually cover Economics and Econometrics (1.1k papers), General Economics, Econometrics and Finance (524 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (399 papers) specifically the topics of Fiscal Policy and Economic Growth (420 papers), Global trade and economics (330 papers) and Economic Growth and Productivity (229 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Review of Development Economics are Jean‐Claude Berthélemy, Ravi Kanbur, Jong Il Choe, Xiaobo Zhang, Gabriela Mundaca, Heng‐Fu Zou, Hongyi Li, Geeta Kingdon, Robert Elliott and Syed Mansoob Murshed.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Review of Development Economics

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Review of Development Economics. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Review of Development Economics.

Countries where authors publish in Review of Development Economics

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Review of Development Economics. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Review of Development Economics with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Review of Development Economics more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025