Marcus Cunliffe

37 papers receiving 138 citations

Peers

Marcus Cunliffe
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Marketing 45
  • History 50
  • Political Science and International Relations 111
  • Literature and Literary Theory 41
  • Sociology and Political Science 119
Replace Stephen B. Oates with:
Stephen B. Oates United States
Merton L. Dillon United States
Karen J. Blair United States
Janet Wilson James United States
Julie Roy Jeffrey United States
Richard P. Gildrie United States
Gustaaf Van Cromphout United States
Stephen Botein United States
Rayford Whittingham Logan United States
Dan T. Carter United States
Marcus Cunliffe relative to Stephen B. Oates United States Stephen B. Oates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2×4×6×
Stephen B. Oates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Marcus Cunliffe

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Marcus Cunliffe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Marcus Cunliffe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Marcus Cunliffe more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Marcus Cunliffe

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Marcus Cunliffe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Marcus Cunliffe. The network helps show where Marcus Cunliffe may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside Marcus Cunliffe, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Marcus Cunliffe Line = papers co-authored together Marcus Cunliffe links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 52 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 196930
2 198030
3 198824
4 198120
5 195717
6 196316
7 195815
8 198413
9
Anti-Americanism in Europe
198612
10 198810
11 19898
12 19907
13 19706
14
American literature since 1900
19756
15 19605
16 19685
17 19815
18 19865
19 19554
20 19664

About Marcus Cunliffe

Marcus Cunliffe is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, History, Marketing, Anthropology and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 52 papers that have together received 285 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include American Constitutional Law and Politics (16 papers), American History and Culture (5 papers), Colonialism, slavery, and trade (4 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (3 papers), Mormonism, Religion, and History (2 papers), American Literature and Culture (2 papers), American and British Literature Analysis (2 papers) and Medieval Literature and History (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (45 citations), History (50 citations), Political Science and International Relations (111 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (41 citations) and Sociology and Political Science (119 citations). Marcus Cunliffe has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Germany. Frequent co-authors include John K. Mahon, Norman Foerster, David S. Reynolds, Robin W. Winks, Rob Kroes, David Geoffrey Green, Bertram Wyatt‐Brown, Page Smith, Gay Wilson Allen and James Thomas Flexner. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of American History, The American Historical Review, American Quarterly, Journal of the Early Republic and The William and Mary Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact