M. Scott Myers

593 total citations
6 papers, 328 citations indexed

About

M. Scott Myers is a scholar working on Information Systems and Management, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry. According to data from OpenAlex, M. Scott Myers has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 328 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 1 paper in Information Systems and Management, 0 papers in Infectious Diseases and 0 papers in Organic Chemistry. Recurrent topics in M. Scott Myers's work include Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper). M. Scott Myers is often cited by papers focused on Ethics in Business and Education (1 paper). M. Scott Myers collaborates with scholars based in United States. M. Scott Myers's co-authors include and has published in prestigious journals such as California Management Review, Industrial and Labor Relations Review and The Qualitative Report.

In The Last Decade

M. Scott Myers

6 papers receiving 248 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
M. Scott Myers United States	6	75	61	57	48	38	6	328
Robert F. Morrison United States	9	121 1.6×	37 0.6×	49 0.9×	55 1.1×	53 1.4×	19	317
William A. Maesen United States	5	39 0.5×	105 1.7×	32 0.6×	31 0.6×	47 1.2×	13	334
William Gomberg United States	11	70 0.9×	127 2.1×	29 0.5×	44 0.9×	61 1.6×	26	430
Douglas E. Durand United States	9	96 1.3×	75 1.2×	26 0.5×	52 1.1×	20 0.5×	20	383
C.-R. Giroux	3	160 2.1×	52 0.9×	53 0.9×	78 1.6×	61 1.6×	7	351
David A. Statt United States	8	85 1.1×	59 1.0×	39 0.7×	48 1.0×	17 0.4×	15	293
Zandy B. Leibowitz United States	10	122 1.6×	44 0.7×	81 1.4×	68 1.4×	41 1.1×	22	310
Richard S. Barrett United States	9	124 1.7×	45 0.7×	25 0.4×	86 1.8×	21 0.6×	16	350
John E. Stinson United States	10	180 2.4×	54 0.9×	138 2.4×	122 2.5×	45 1.2×	24	448
Peter J. Dean United States	10	101 1.3×	61 1.0×	46 0.8×	39 0.8×	36 0.9×	49	430

Countries citing papers authored by M. Scott Myers

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of M. Scott Myers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Scott Myers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Scott Myers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by M. Scott Myers

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Scott Myers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Scott Myers. The network helps show where M. Scott Myers may publish in the future.

No nodes

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Myers, M. Scott. (2000). Qualitative Research and the Generalizability Question: Standing Firm with Proteus. The Qualitative Report. 189 indexed citations

2.

Myers, M. Scott, et al.. (1974). Toward Understanding the Changing Work Ethic. California Management Review. 16(3). 7–19. 6 indexed citations

3.

Myers, M. Scott, et al.. (1974). A Framework for Measuring Human Assets. California Management Review. 16(4). 5–16. 15 indexed citations

4.

Myers, M. Scott, et al.. (1971). Every Employee a Manager: More Meaningful Work Through Job Enrichment.. Industrial and Labor Relations Review. 24(4). 643–643. 9 indexed citations

5.

Myers, M. Scott. (1968). Every Employee a Manager. California Management Review. 10(3). 9–20. 55 indexed citations

6.

Myers, M. Scott, et al.. (1966). BREAKTHROUGH IN ON THE JOB TRAINING.. 54 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact