M. Marciňáková
- Food Science top 5%
- Molecular Biology
- Animal Science and Zoology top 5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 10%
- Agronomy and Crop Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Andrea LaukováViola StrompfováMonika Pogány SimonováSoňa GancarčíkováZuzana JonecováBirgitte Bjørn BuddeJana KoščováKlaudia Čobanová
- Topics
- Probiotics and Fermented Foods (12 papers)Animal Nutrition and Physiology (7 papers)Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (4 papers)
In The Last Decade
M. Marciňáková
15 papers receiving 397 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 49
- Food Science 309
- Molecular Biology 207
- Animal Science and Zoology 179
- Nutrition and Dietetics 108
- Agronomy and Crop Science 58
Countries citing papers authored by M. Marciňáková
This map shows the geographic impact of M. Marciňáková's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by M. Marciňáková with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites M. Marciňáková more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by M. Marciňáková
This network shows the impact of papers produced by M. Marciňáková. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by M. Marciňáková. The network helps show where M. Marciňáková may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of M. Marciňáková
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of M. Marciňáková. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of M. Marciňáková based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with M. Marciňáková. M. Marciňáková is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Testing of probiotic and bacteriocin-producing lactic acid bacteria towards Eimeria sp. | 8 |
| 2 | 31 | |
| 3 | 58 | |
| 4 | 18 | |
| 5 | 23 | |
| 6 | 8 | |
| 7 | 47 | |
| 8 | 49 | |
| 9 | 53 | |
| 10 | 67 | |
| 11 | Occurrence of structural enterocin genes among silage enterococci | 6 |
| 12 | 5 | |
| 13 | 27 | |
| 14 | Effect of potential probiotic activity of Enterococcus faecium EE3 strain against Salmonella infection in Japanese quails | 8 |
| 15 | 28 |
About M. Marciňáková
M. Marciňáková is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Food Science and Agronomy and Crop Science, having authored 15 papers that have together received 436 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Probiotics and Fermented Foods (12 papers), Animal Nutrition and Physiology (7 papers) and Microbial Metabolites in Food Biotechnology (4 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Animal Science and Zoology (179 citations), Food Science (309 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (108 citations). M. Marciňáková has collaborated with scholars based in Slovakia, Slovenia and Finland. Frequent co-authors include Andrea Lauková, Viola Strompfová, Monika Pogány Simonová, Soňa Gancarčíková, Zuzana Jonecová, Birgitte Bjørn Budde, Jana Koščová, Klaudia Čobanová, Satu Vesterlund and Sara Bover‐Cid. Their work appears in journals such as Meat Science, Veterinary Microbiology and Anaerobe.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.