Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
On the Design of and Interaction with Conversational Agents: An Organizing and Assessing Review of Human-Computer Interaction Research
2022140 citationsAlfred Brendel, Lutz M. Kolbe et al.Journal of the Association for Information Systemsprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Lutz M. Kolbe's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lutz M. Kolbe with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lutz M. Kolbe more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lutz M. Kolbe. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lutz M. Kolbe. The network helps show where Lutz M. Kolbe may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lutz M. Kolbe
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lutz M. Kolbe.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lutz M. Kolbe based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lutz M. Kolbe. Lutz M. Kolbe is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Brendel, Alfred, et al.. (2019). TO NUDGE OR NOT TO NUDGE: ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS OF DIGITAL NUDGING BASED ON ITS BEHAVIORAL ECONOMICS ROOTS. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.24 indexed citations
5.
Brendel, Alfred, et al.. (2017). A Decision Support System for Computation of Carsharing Pricing Areas and its Influence on Vehicle Distribution. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.15 indexed citations
6.
Remané, Gerrit, Björn Hildebrandt, André Hanelt, & Lutz M. Kolbe. (2016). DISCOVERING NEW DIGITAL BUSINESS MODEL TYPES – A STUDY OF TECHNOLOGY STARTUPS FROM THE MOBILITY SECTOR. Pacific Asia Conference on Information Systems. 289.15 indexed citations
7.
Zander, Sebastian, et al.. (2016). SHIFTING FROM JUSTIFICATION TO UNDERSTANDING: THE IMPACT OF ENVIRONMENTAL UNCERTAINTY ON THE VALUE OF IT-ENABLED COLLABORATION IN SUPPLY CHAINS. European Conference on Information Systems.2 indexed citations
8.
Piccinini, Everlin, Robert Wayne Gregory, & Lutz M. Kolbe. (2015). Changes in the Producer-Consumer Relationship - Towards Digital Transformation. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1634–1648.55 indexed citations
9.
Kranz, Johann, et al.. (2015). Predicting Product Returns in E-Commerce: The Contribution of Mahalanobis Feature Extraction. International Conference on Information Systems.17 indexed citations
10.
Hildebrandt, Björn, et al.. (2015). Value Co-creation through Network IT Alignment: An Empirical Examination in Regional Networks.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
11.
Nastjuk, Ilja & Lutz M. Kolbe. (2015). On the Duality of Stress in Information Systems Research – The Case of Electric Vehicles. International Conference on Information Systems. 1–22.6 indexed citations
12.
Piccinini, Everlin, André Hanelt, Robert Wayne Gregory, & Lutz M. Kolbe. (2015). Transforming Industrial Business: The Impact of Digital Transformation on Automotive Organizations. International Conference on Information Systems.107 indexed citations
13.
Kolbe, Lutz M., et al.. (2014). ENVIRONMENTALLY SUSTAINABLE BUSINESS PROCESS MANAGEMENT – DEVELOPING A GREEN BPM READINESS MODEL. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 12.14 indexed citations
14.
Büsse, Sebastian, et al.. (2012). THE EVOLVEMENT OF ENERGY INFORMATICS IN THE INFORMATION SYSTEMS COMMUNITY - A LITERATURE ANALYSIS AND RESEARCH AGENDA. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.20 indexed citations
15.
Erek, Koray, et al.. (2011). Aligning Green IT with Environmental Strategies: Development of a Conceptual Framework that Leverages Sustainability and Firm Competitiveness. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.24 indexed citations
16.
Erek, Koray, et al.. (2011). Green It Strategies: A Case Study-Based Framework For Aligning Green It With Competitive Environmental Strategies. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 59.15 indexed citations
17.
Marrone, Mauricio & Lutz M. Kolbe. (2010). Mapping Improvements Achievable through the Adoption of IT Governance. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 73.1 indexed citations
18.
Kolbe, Lutz M., et al.. (2009). Potential of Web 2.0 Applications for Viewer Retention. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 485.2 indexed citations
19.
Kolbe, Lutz M., et al.. (2008). Managing of Information Systems Risks in Extended Enterprises: The Case of Outsourcing. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 280.4 indexed citations
20.
Geib, Malte, Lutz M. Kolbe, & Walter Brenner. (2004). Collaborative Customer Management in Financial Services Alliances. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 480.9 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.