Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
“Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?
2013531 citationsChristian Gold, Daniel Damböck et al.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meetingprofile →
How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving
2014324 citationsJonas Radlmayr, Christian Gold et al.Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meetingprofile →
Keep Your Scanners Peeled
2016234 citationsSebastian Hergeth, Lutz Lorenz et al.Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Societyprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Lutz Lorenz's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lutz Lorenz with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lutz Lorenz more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lutz Lorenz. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lutz Lorenz. The network helps show where Lutz Lorenz may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lutz Lorenz
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lutz Lorenz.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lutz Lorenz based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Lutz Lorenz. Lutz Lorenz is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
14 of 14 papers shown
1.
Hergeth, Sebastian, Lutz Lorenz, Roman Vilimek, & Josef F. Krems. (2016). Keep Your Scanners Peeled. Human Factors The Journal of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society. 58(3). 509–519.234 indexed citations breakdown →
Radlmayr, Jonas, et al.. (2014). How Traffic Situations and Non-Driving Related Tasks Affect the Take-Over Quality in Highly Automated Driving. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 58(1). 2063–2067.324 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Gold, Christian, Lutz Lorenz, & Klaus Bengler. (2014). Influence of Automated Brake Application on Take-Over Situations in Highly Automated Driving Scenarios. mediaTUM (Technical University of Munich).20 indexed citations
Gold, Christian, Daniel Damböck, Klaus Bengler, & Lutz Lorenz. (2013). Partially Automated Driving as a Fallback Level of High Automation. mediaTUM – the media and publications repository of the Technical University Munich (Technical University Munich).32 indexed citations
11.
Gold, Christian, Daniel Damböck, Lutz Lorenz, & Klaus Bengler. (2013). “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?. Proceedings of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society Annual Meeting. 57(1). 1938–1942.531 indexed citations breakdown →
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.