Luisa Natali

14 papers receiving 440 citations

Peers

Luisa Natali
Comparison fields: 5 of 62
  • Safety Research 174
  • Gender Studies 128
  • Business and International Management 11
  • Nutrition and Dietetics 69
  • Social Psychology 90
Replace Chris de Neubourg with:
Chris de Neubourg Netherlands
Diana Krüger Chile
Leandro Carvalho United States
Kate Orkin United Kingdom
Subha Mani United States
Amaresh Dubey India
Yekaterina Chzhen Ireland
Alberto Posso Australia
Jérémie Gignoux France
Marco Stampini United States
Luisa Natali relative to Chris de Neubourg Netherlands Chris de Neubourg's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×5.8×
Chris de Neubourg · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Luisa Natali

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Luisa Natali's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Luisa Natali with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Luisa Natali more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Luisa Natali

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Luisa Natali. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Luisa Natali. The network helps show where Luisa Natali may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Luisa Natali, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Luisa Natali Line = papers co-authored together Luisa Natali links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

15 of 15 papers shown
#Work
1 2013184
2 2013100
3 201887
4 201829
5 201823
6 201618
7 201315
8
Malawi Social Cash Transfer Program Baseline Evaluation Report
201411
9 202010
10 20251
11 20141
12 20171
13 20141
14 20141
15 20240

About Luisa Natali

Luisa Natali is a scholar working on Safety Research, Sociology and Political Science, Economics and Econometrics, Nutrition and Dietetics and Computer Networks and Communications, having authored 15 papers that have together received 482 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Poverty, Education, and Child Welfare (8 papers), Child Nutrition and Water Access (4 papers), Income, Poverty, and Inequality (4 papers), Microfinance and Financial Inclusion (4 papers), Image and Video Quality Assessment (2 papers), Caching and Content Delivery (2 papers), Peer-to-Peer Network Technologies (2 papers) and International Development and Aid (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Safety Research (174 citations), Gender Studies (128 citations), Business and International Management (11 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (69 citations) and Social Psychology (90 citations). Luisa Natali has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Naila Kabeer, Sudhanshu Handa, Bruno Martorano, David Seidenfeld, Gelson Tembo, Chris de Neubourg, Jonathan Bradshaw, Benjamin Davis, Amber Peterman and Fidelia A. A. Dake. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Development Economics, Journal of Development Effectiveness, Social Indicators Research, Studies in Family Planning and SSM - Population Health.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact