Studies in Family Planning

2.2k papers and 54.4k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.2k papers published in Studies in Family Planning in the last decades have received a total of 54.4k indexed citations. Papers published in Studies in Family Planning usually cover Pediatrics, Perinatology and Child Health (1.1k papers), Gender Studies (606 papers) and General Health Professions (588 papers) specifically the topics of Global Maternal and Child Health (1.0k papers), Reproductive Health and Contraception (446 papers) and Demographic Trends and Gender Preferences (436 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Studies in Family Planning are John Bongaarts, Judith Bruce, Ann K. Blanc, Gilda Sedgh, Rubina Hussain, Anrudh K. Jain, Michael Koenig, Christopher Tietze, Susheela Singh and Shireen Jejeebhoy.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Studies in Family Planning

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Studies in Family Planning. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Studies in Family Planning.

Countries where authors publish in Studies in Family Planning

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Studies in Family Planning. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Studies in Family Planning with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Studies in Family Planning more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025