Lucas Gren

523 total citations
20 papers, 201 citations indexed

About

Lucas Gren is a scholar working on Information Systems, Social Psychology and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Lucas Gren has authored 20 papers receiving a total of 201 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Information Systems, 6 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Lucas Gren's work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (19 papers), Software Engineering Research (15 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers). Lucas Gren is often cited by papers focused on Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (19 papers), Software Engineering Research (15 papers) and Team Dynamics and Performance (6 papers). Lucas Gren collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Switzerland and Canada. Lucas Gren's co-authors include Robert Feldt, Richard Torkar, Paul Ralph, Francisco Gomes de Oliveira Neto, Carlo A. Furia, Per Lenberg, Alessia Knauss, Christoph Johann Stettina, Alfredo Goldman and Erik A. Tholén and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Systems and Software, Information and Software Technology and Journal of Software Evolution and Process.

In The Last Decade

Lucas Gren

17 papers receiving 194 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Lucas Gren Sweden	7	131	38	32	27	26	20	201
Claudia de O. Melo Brazil	6	211 1.6×	40 1.1×	50 1.6×	18 0.7×	35 1.3×	10	255
Eva Amdahl Seim Norway	7	184 1.4×	59 1.6×	40 1.3×	21 0.8×	61 2.3×	9	264
Jil Klünder Germany	10	188 1.4×	40 1.1×	24 0.8×	17 0.6×	45 1.7×	46	300
Ken Power United States	7	209 1.6×	52 1.4×	42 1.3×	9 0.3×	59 2.3×	16	263
Martin Kropp Switzerland	10	189 1.4×	27 0.7×	96 3.0×	11 0.4×	24 0.9×	29	248
Sharon Coyle Ireland	6	172 1.3×	59 1.6×	24 0.8×	8 0.3×	60 2.3×	14	217
Tobias Hildenbrand Germany	9	214 1.6×	21 0.6×	64 2.0×	15 0.6×	65 2.5×	37	260
Yngve Lindsjørn Norway	6	250 1.9×	60 1.6×	67 2.1×	60 2.2×	71 2.7×	8	379
Hendrik Meth Germany	6	213 1.6×	26 0.7×	64 2.0×	9 0.3×	57 2.2×	8	351
Timo Lehtinen Finland	9	207 1.6×	12 0.3×	61 1.9×	12 0.4×	40 1.5×	17	275

Countries citing papers authored by Lucas Gren

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Lucas Gren's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lucas Gren with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lucas Gren more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Lucas Gren

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lucas Gren. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lucas Gren. The network helps show where Lucas Gren may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lucas Gren

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lucas Gren. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lucas Gren based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lucas Gren. Lucas Gren is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Massoni, Tiago, et al.. (2024). Views on Agile Leadership for Software Teams: A Case Study with Leaders and Non-Leaders. 126–135.

Gren, Lucas, et al.. (2024). Investigating Team Maturity in an Agile Automotive Reorganization. 226–229.

Lenberg, Per, et al.. (2023). Qualitative software engineering research: Reflections and guidelines. Journal of Software Evolution and Process. 36(6). 11 indexed citations

Gren, Lucas & Paul Ralph. (2022). What makes effective leadership in agile software development teams?. arXiv (Cornell University). 2402–2414. 25 indexed citations

Gren, Lucas. (2020). Understanding Work Practices of Autonomous Agile Teams: A Social-psychological Review. Lecture notes in business information processing. 227–235. 2 indexed citations

Gren, Lucas & Alfredo Goldman. (2019). Useful Statistical Methods for Human Factors Research in Software Engineering: A Discussion on Validation with Quantitative Data. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 2 indexed citations

Neto, Francisco Gomes de Oliveira, et al.. (2019). Evolution of statistical analysis in empirical software engineering research: Current state and steps forward. Journal of Systems and Software. 156. 246–267. 38 indexed citations

Gren, Lucas, et al.. (2019). Choosing agile or plan-driven enterprise resource planning (ERP) implementations -- A study on 21 implementations from 20 companies. arXiv (Cornell University). 40–55. 2 indexed citations

Tholén, Erik A., et al.. (2019). Social Identity in Software Development. 107–114. 5 indexed citations

10.

Torkar, Richard, Carlo A. Furia, Robert Feldt, et al.. (2018). A Method to Assess and Argue for Practical Significance in Software Engineering. arXiv (Cornell University). 15 indexed citations

11.

Gren, Lucas, Alessia Knauss, & Christoph Johann Stettina. (2018). Non-technical individual skills are weakly connected to the maturity of agile practices. Information and Software Technology. 99. 11–20. 10 indexed citations

12.

Gren, Lucas & Per Lenberg. (2018). The importance of conflict resolution techniques in autonomous agile teams. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 1–4. 5 indexed citations

13.

Gren, Lucas. (2018). Studying attitudes and social norms in agile software development. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 1–4.

14.

Gren, Lucas, Richard Torkar, & Robert Feldt. (2017). Group development and group maturity when building agile teams. arXiv (Cornell University). 124. 104–119. 23 indexed citations

15.

Torkar, Richard, Robert Feldt, Francisco Gomes de Oliveira Neto, & Lucas Gren. (2017). Statistical and practical significance of empirical software engineering research: A maturity model. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations

16.

Gren, Lucas, et al.. (2017). Group Developmental Psychology and Software Development Performance. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 12. 232–234. 1 indexed citations

17.

Gren, Lucas. (2017). Psychological group processes when building agile software development teams. Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University). 1 indexed citations

18.

Gren, Lucas, Richard Torkar, & Robert Feldt. (2016). Group development and group maturity when building agile teams: A qualitative and quantitative investigation at eight large companies. Journal of Systems and Software. 124. 104–119. 56 indexed citations

19.

Gren, Lucas & Alfredo Goldman. (2016). Trying to Increase the Mature Use of Agile Practices by Group Development Psychology Training - An Experiment.. 50–57. 1 indexed citations

20.

Svensson, Richard Berntsson, et al.. (2015). Creativity Techniques for More Creative Requirements: Theory vs. Practice. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 104–111. 3 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact