Panagiota Chatzipetrou

410 total citations
30 papers, 230 citations indexed

About

Panagiota Chatzipetrou is a scholar working on Information Systems, Artificial Intelligence and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Panagiota Chatzipetrou has authored 30 papers receiving a total of 230 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 22 papers in Information Systems, 8 papers in Artificial Intelligence and 7 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Panagiota Chatzipetrou's work include Software Engineering Research (17 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (15 papers) and Software Reliability and Analysis Research (5 papers). Panagiota Chatzipetrou is often cited by papers focused on Software Engineering Research (17 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (15 papers) and Software Reliability and Analysis Research (5 papers). Panagiota Chatzipetrou collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Greece and Germany. Panagiota Chatzipetrou's co-authors include Lefteris Angelis, Tony Gorschek, Claes Wohlin, Efi Papatheocharous, Emil Alégroth, Sebastian Barney, Rafael Prikladnicki, Markus Borg, Krzysztof Wnuk and Nirnaya Tripathi and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Communications of the ACM and IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Panagiota Chatzipetrou

22 papers receiving 221 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Panagiota Chatzipetrou Sweden 11 173 44 41 36 35 30 230
Sebastian Barney Sweden 9 190 1.1× 54 1.2× 30 0.7× 46 1.3× 55 1.6× 16 260
Wolfhart B. Goethert United States 6 143 0.8× 60 1.4× 32 0.8× 21 0.6× 41 1.2× 8 200
Daniel Kiefer Germany 4 166 1.0× 59 1.3× 21 0.5× 20 0.6× 35 1.0× 8 220
Claudia de O. Melo Brazil 6 211 1.2× 35 0.8× 19 0.5× 50 1.4× 16 0.5× 10 255
Ronald Jabangwe Sweden 10 230 1.3× 47 1.1× 61 1.5× 68 1.9× 31 0.9× 22 316
Jennifer Stapleton United Kingdom 5 207 1.2× 66 1.5× 48 1.2× 31 0.9× 44 1.3× 8 266
Michael Stupperich Germany 7 236 1.4× 57 1.3× 31 0.8× 24 0.7× 65 1.9× 7 281
Veli-Pekka Eloranta Finland 8 192 1.1× 31 0.7× 43 1.0× 33 0.9× 46 1.3× 20 247
Teade Punter Netherlands 9 189 1.1× 45 1.0× 52 1.3× 53 1.5× 66 1.9× 14 241
Johan Linåker Sweden 10 153 0.9× 44 1.0× 32 0.8× 106 2.9× 32 0.9× 20 271

Countries citing papers authored by Panagiota Chatzipetrou

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Panagiota Chatzipetrou's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Panagiota Chatzipetrou with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Panagiota Chatzipetrou more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Panagiota Chatzipetrou

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Panagiota Chatzipetrou. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Panagiota Chatzipetrou. The network helps show where Panagiota Chatzipetrou may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Panagiota Chatzipetrou

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Panagiota Chatzipetrou. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Panagiota Chatzipetrou based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Panagiota Chatzipetrou. Panagiota Chatzipetrou is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Moe, Nils Brede, et al.. (2025). Trust vs. Control: Comparing Flexible and Restrictive Hybrid Work Policies in Two Software Companies. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 535–545.
3.
Yu, Liang, Emil Alégroth, Panagiota Chatzipetrou, & Tony Gorschek. (2025). Measuring the quality of generative AI systems: Mapping metrics to quality characteristics — Snowballing literature review. Information and Software Technology. 186. 107802–107802.
5.
Yu, Liang, Emil Alégroth, Panagiota Chatzipetrou, & Tony Gorschek. (2024). A Roadmap for Using Continuous Integration Environments. Communications of the ACM. 67(6). 82–90.
6.
Yu, Liang, Emil Alégroth, Panagiota Chatzipetrou, & Tony Gorschek. (2023). Automated NFR testing in continuous integration environments: a multi-case study of Nordic companies. Empirical Software Engineering. 28(6).
7.
Franch, Xavier, Cristina Palomares, Carme Quer, Panagiota Chatzipetrou, & Tony Gorschek. (2023). The state-of-practice in requirements specification: an extended interview study at 12 companies. Requirements Engineering. 28(3). 377–409. 10 indexed citations
8.
Chatzipetrou, Panagiota, et al.. (2023). Students’ Acceptance Of Digital Exams: A Case Study In A Swedish University. 22(1). 69–77.
9.
Klotins, Eriks, Michael Unterkalmsteiner, Panagiota Chatzipetrou, et al.. (2021). SIoT Framework: Towards an Approach for Early Identification of Security Requirements for Internet-of-things Applications. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 15(1). 2 indexed citations
10.
Chatzipetrou, Panagiota, Efi Papatheocharous, Krzysztof Wnuk, et al.. (2019). Component attributes and their importance in decisions and component selection. Software Quality Journal. 28(2). 567–593. 14 indexed citations
11.
Klotins, Eriks, Michael Unterkalmsteiner, Panagiota Chatzipetrou, et al.. (2019). A Progression Model of Software Engineering Goals, Challenges, and Practices in Start-Ups. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering. 47(3). 498–521. 39 indexed citations
12.
Börstler, Jürgen, et al.. (2019). Understanding the order of agile practice introduction: Comparing agile maturity models and practitioners’ experience. Journal of Systems and Software. 156. 1–20. 17 indexed citations
13.
Borg, Markus, Panagiota Chatzipetrou, Krzysztof Wnuk, et al.. (2019). Selecting component sourcing options: A survey of software engineering’s broader make-or-buy decisions. Information and Software Technology. 112. 18–34. 14 indexed citations
14.
Šmite, Darja, Rini van Solingen, & Panagiota Chatzipetrou. (2019). The Offshoring Elephant in the Room: Turnover. IEEE Software. 37(3). 54–62. 2 indexed citations
15.
Chatzipetrou, Panagiota, Darja Šmite, & Rini van Solingen. (2018). When and who leaves matters. 1–4. 5 indexed citations
16.
Chatzipetrou, Panagiota, Emil Alégroth, Efi Papatheocharous, et al.. (2018). Component Selection in Software Engineering - Which Attributes are the Most Important in the Decision Process?. 198–205. 10 indexed citations
17.
Borg, Markus, Panagiota Chatzipetrou, Krzysztof Wnuk, et al.. (2018). Selecting Software Component Sourcing Options : Detailed Survey Description and Analysis. KTH Publication Database DiVA (KTH Royal Institute of Technology). 2 indexed citations
18.
Barney, Sebastian, et al.. (2013). Software quality across borders: Three case studies on company internal alignment. Information and Software Technology. 56(1). 20–38. 13 indexed citations
19.
Chatzipetrou, Panagiota, Lefteris Angelis, Sebastian Barney, & Claes Wohlin. (2011). Software Product Quality in Global Software Development: Finding Groups with Aligned Goals. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 1. 435–442. 3 indexed citations
20.
Barney, Sebastian, Claes Wohlin, Panagiota Chatzipetrou, & Lefteris Angelis. (2011). Offshore Insourcing: A Case Study on Software Quality Alignment. Lund University Publications (Lund University). 1. 146–155. 11 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026