Eva Amdahl Seim
- Information Systems top 5%
- Management Information Systems top 10%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 5%
- Computer Networks and Communications
- Computer Science Applications top 10%
- Co-authors
- Nils Brede MoeTorgeir DingsøyrTor Erlend FægriKnut H. RollandBjørn AndersenHans TorvatnSylvi ThunViktoria Stray
- Topics
- Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (4 papers)Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers)Open Source Software Innovations (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- Norway
In The Last Decade
Eva Amdahl Seim
9 papers receiving 249 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 44
- Information Systems 184
- Management Information Systems 61
- Management of Technology and Innovation 59
- Computer Networks and Communications 48
- Computer Science Applications 40
Countries citing papers authored by Eva Amdahl Seim
This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Amdahl Seim's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Amdahl Seim with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Amdahl Seim more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Eva Amdahl Seim
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Amdahl Seim. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Amdahl Seim. The network helps show where Eva Amdahl Seim may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eva Amdahl Seim
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eva Amdahl Seim. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eva Amdahl Seim based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Eva Amdahl Seim. Eva Amdahl Seim is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | Enhancing Learning and Collaboration in Organisations through In-house Crowdsourcing | 1 |
| 3 | 16 | |
| 4 | 64 | |
| 5 | 7 | |
| 6 | 137 | |
| 7 | 20 | |
| 8 | 1 | |
| 9 | Lean Construction Practices and its Effects: A Case Study at St Olav’s Integrated Hospital, Norway | 12 |
About Eva Amdahl Seim
Eva Amdahl Seim is a scholar working on Computer Science Applications, Management Information Systems and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 9 papers that have together received 264 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (4 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (3 papers) and Open Source Software Innovations (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Management of Technology and Innovation (59 citations), Information Systems (184 citations) and Computer Science Applications (40 citations). Eva Amdahl Seim has collaborated with scholars based in Norway. Frequent co-authors include Nils Brede Moe, Torgeir Dingsøyr, Tor Erlend Fægri, Knut H. Rolland, Bjørn Andersen, Hans Torvatn, Sylvi Thun, Viktoria Stray, Finn Olav Bjørnson and Sobah Abbas Petersen. Their work appears in journals such as Empirical Software Engineering, Project Management Journal and The TQM Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.