Per Lenberg

475 total citations
11 papers, 237 citations indexed

About

Per Lenberg is a scholar working on Information Systems, Social Psychology and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Per Lenberg has authored 11 papers receiving a total of 237 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 10 papers in Information Systems, 2 papers in Social Psychology and 2 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Per Lenberg's work include Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (10 papers), Software Engineering Research (9 papers) and Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (2 papers). Per Lenberg is often cited by papers focused on Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (10 papers), Software Engineering Research (9 papers) and Systems Engineering Methodologies and Applications (2 papers). Per Lenberg collaborates with scholars based in Sweden, Australia and South Africa. Per Lenberg's co-authors include Robert Feldt, Lars Göran Wallgren, Lucas Gren, Carlo A. Furia, Daniel Graziotin, Francisco Gomes de Oliveira Neto, Neil Ernst, Richard Torkar, Inga Tidefors and Emil Alégroth and has published in prestigious journals such as IEEE Software, Journal of Systems and Software and Empirical Software Engineering.

In The Last Decade

Per Lenberg

11 papers receiving 230 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Per Lenberg Sweden 7 174 61 29 23 20 11 237
Gerardo Matturro Uruguay 8 158 0.9× 61 1.0× 16 0.6× 16 0.7× 23 1.1× 23 262
Tatiana B. Gouveia Brazil 9 191 1.1× 51 0.8× 33 1.1× 24 1.0× 37 1.9× 15 291
Edson Oliveira Brazil 8 137 0.8× 51 0.8× 37 1.3× 9 0.4× 30 1.5× 23 246
Lars Göran Wallgren Sweden 5 123 0.7× 48 0.8× 21 0.7× 49 2.1× 10 0.5× 10 225
César França Brazil 7 109 0.6× 63 1.0× 13 0.4× 28 1.2× 18 0.9× 33 205
Samantha Jiménez Mexico 7 127 0.7× 55 0.9× 73 2.5× 12 0.5× 33 1.6× 48 244
José Antonio Pow-Sang Peru 11 168 1.0× 45 0.7× 34 1.2× 7 0.3× 27 1.4× 28 317
Daniel Port United States 9 187 1.1× 76 1.2× 33 1.1× 11 0.5× 77 3.9× 32 281
Martin Kropp Switzerland 10 189 1.1× 96 1.6× 12 0.4× 11 0.5× 20 1.0× 29 248
Marta N. Gómez Spain 6 202 1.2× 59 1.0× 12 0.4× 72 3.1× 22 1.1× 11 287

Countries citing papers authored by Per Lenberg

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Per Lenberg's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Per Lenberg with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Per Lenberg more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Per Lenberg

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Per Lenberg. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Per Lenberg. The network helps show where Per Lenberg may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Per Lenberg

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Per Lenberg. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Per Lenberg based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Per Lenberg. Per Lenberg is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

11 of 11 papers shown
1.
Penzenstadler, Birgit, Brittany Johnson, Muneera Bano, & Per Lenberg. (2024). Well-Being and Resilience: Developers Thrive!. IEEE Software. 41(4). 38–42. 1 indexed citations
2.
Lenberg, Per, et al.. (2023). Qualitative software engineering research: Reflections and guidelines. Journal of Software Evolution and Process. 36(6). 11 indexed citations
3.
Graziotin, Daniel, Per Lenberg, Robert Feldt, & Stefan Wagner. (2020). Behavioral Software Engineering: Methodological Introduction to Psychometrics.. arXiv (Cornell University). 1 indexed citations
4.
Torkar, Richard, Carlo A. Furia, Robert Feldt, et al.. (2018). A Method to Assess and Argue for Practical Significance in Software Engineering. arXiv (Cornell University). 15 indexed citations
5.
Gren, Lucas & Per Lenberg. (2018). The importance of conflict resolution techniques in autonomous agile teams. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 1–4. 5 indexed citations
6.
Lenberg, Per, et al.. (2018). Misaligned values in software engineering organizations. Journal of Software Evolution and Process. 31(3). 6 indexed citations
7.
Lenberg, Per, et al.. (2016). An initial analysis of software engineers’ attitudes towards organizational change. Empirical Software Engineering. 22(4). 2179–2205. 20 indexed citations
8.
Lenberg, Per, et al.. (2016). An initial analysis of differences in software engineers' attitudes towards organizational change. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 1–7. 2 indexed citations
9.
Lenberg, Per, Robert Feldt, & Lars Göran Wallgren. (2015). Human Factors Related Challenges in Software Engineering -- An Industrial Perspective. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 43–49. 14 indexed citations
10.
Lenberg, Per, Robert Feldt, & Lars Göran Wallgren. (2015). Behavioral software engineering: A definition and systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software. 107. 15–37. 136 indexed citations
11.
Lenberg, Per, et al.. (2014). Towards a behavioral software engineering. Chalmers Research (Chalmers University of Technology). 48–55. 26 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026