Louise Cottle
About
In The Last Decade
Louise Cottle
11 papers receiving 388 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Molecular Biology 165
- Neurology 141
- Surgery 118
- Physiology 95
- Genetics 67
Countries citing papers authored by Louise Cottle
This map shows the geographic impact of Louise Cottle's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Louise Cottle with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Louise Cottle more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Louise Cottle
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Louise Cottle. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Louise Cottle. The network helps show where Louise Cottle may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Louise Cottle
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Louise Cottle. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Louise Cottle based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Louise Cottle. Louise Cottle is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 39 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 21 | |
| 8 | 63 | |
| 9 | 2 | |
| 10 | 8 | |
| 11 | 188 | |
| 12 | 63 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.