Lori Beth Dixon
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Nutrition and Dietetics top 5%
- Physiology
- Pharmacy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Kathy RadimerMarilyn A. WinklebyNancy D. ErnstSusan M. Krebs‐SmithFrances J. CroninMary StoryRobert W. BlumDianne Neumark‐Sztainer
- Topics
- Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers)Nutritional Studies and Diet (6 papers)Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (3 papers)
- Cited by
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational HealthGeneral Health ProfessionsNutrition and Dietetics
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Lori Beth Dixon
12 papers receiving 529 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 94
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 371
- General Health Professions 297
- Nutrition and Dietetics 178
- Physiology 81
- Pharmacy 43
Countries citing papers authored by Lori Beth Dixon
This map shows the geographic impact of Lori Beth Dixon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lori Beth Dixon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lori Beth Dixon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lori Beth Dixon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lori Beth Dixon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lori Beth Dixon. The network helps show where Lori Beth Dixon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lori Beth Dixon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lori Beth Dixon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lori Beth Dixon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lori Beth Dixon. Lori Beth Dixon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 32 | |
| 2 | Chico's First-Year Experience Course: A Case Study | 4 |
| 3 | 271 | |
| 4 | 49 | |
| 5 | 42 | |
| 6 | 23 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | 57 | |
| 10 | 34 | |
| 11 | 1 | |
| 12 | 31 |
About Lori Beth Dixon
Lori Beth Dixon is a scholar working on Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health, Pharmacy and Nutrition and Dietetics, having authored 12 papers that have together received 583 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (7 papers), Nutritional Studies and Diet (6 papers) and Consumer Attitudes and Food Labeling (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health (371 citations), General Health Professions (297 citations) and Nutrition and Dietetics (178 citations). Lori Beth Dixon has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Kathy Radimer, Marilyn A. Winkleby, Nancy D. Ernst, Susan M. Krebs‐Smith, Frances J. Cronin, Mary Story, Robert W. Blum, Dianne Neumark‐Sztainer, Diane C. Mitchell and Helen Smiciklas‐Wright. Their work appears in journals such as American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, PEDIATRICS and American Journal of Epidemiology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.