Loreta Cannito

23 papers receiving 398 citations

Hit Papers

Psychological factors and consumer behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic 2021 · 168 citations
1680+1+3Years since publication50100150

Peers

Loreta Cannito
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • General Decision Sciences 33
  • Applied Psychology 48
  • Marketing 84
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 82
  • Clinical Psychology 97
Replace Ellen Evers with:
Ellen Evers United States
Ambra Brizi Italy
Christoph Schild Germany
Michail D. Kokkoris Austria
Alec Smith United States
Agata Gąsiorowska Poland
Ruth Pogacar Canada
Helma van den Berg Netherlands
Zoë Chance United States
Moty Amar Israel
Loreta Cannito relative to Ellen Evers United States Ellen Evers's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Ellen Evers · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Loreta Cannito

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Loreta Cannito's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Loreta Cannito with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Loreta Cannito more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Loreta Cannito

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Loreta Cannito. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Loreta Cannito. The network helps show where Loreta Cannito may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Loreta Cannito, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Loreta Cannito Line = papers co-authored together Loreta Cannito links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 25 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Psychological factors and consumer behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic
Hit paper breakdown →
2021168
2 202055
3 202435
4 201926
5 202123
6 202221
7 202013
8 202311
9 202210
10 20218
11 20226
12 20226
13 20235
14 20225
15 20225
16 20233
17 20243
18 20223
19 20242
20 20232

About Loreta Cannito

Loreta Cannito is a scholar working on Social Psychology, Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Sociology and Political Science and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 25 papers that have together received 413 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (4 papers), Behavioral Health and Interventions (4 papers), Impact of Technology on Adolescents (4 papers), Neuroendocrine regulation and behavior (3 papers), Child Development and Digital Technology (3 papers), Evolutionary Psychology and Human Behavior (3 papers), COVID-19 and Mental Health (3 papers) and Face Recognition and Perception (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in General Decision Sciences (33 citations), Applied Psychology (48 citations), Marketing (84 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (82 citations) and Clinical Psychology (97 citations). Loreta Cannito has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Riccardo Palumbo, Irene Ceccato, Alberto Di Domenico, Rocco Palumbo, Adolfo Di Crosta, Pasquale La Malva, Nicola Mammarella, Roberta Maiella, Daniela Marchetti and Maria Cristina Verrocchio. Their work appears in journals such as Scientific Reports, Frontiers in Psychology, PLoS ONE, Psychology and Health and Human Behavior and Emerging Technologies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact