Claudio D’Addario
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience top 2%
- Pharmacology top 1%
- Physiology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Co-authors
- Mauro MaccarroneMariangela PucciAndrea Di FrancescoPatrizia RomualdiSanzio CandelettiMaria Vittoria Micioni Di BonaventuraBernardo Dell’OssoCarlo Cifani
- Topics
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (27 papers)Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (27 papers)Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (22 papers)
- Partner nations
- ItalySwedenUnited States
In The Last Decade
Claudio D’Addario
122 papers receiving 2.9k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Molecular Biology 1.1k
- Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience 955
- Pharmacology 617
- Physiology 389
- Cognitive Neuroscience 372
Countries citing papers authored by Claudio D’Addario
This map shows the geographic impact of Claudio D’Addario's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Claudio D’Addario with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Claudio D’Addario more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Claudio D’Addario
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Claudio D’Addario. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Claudio D’Addario. The network helps show where Claudio D’Addario may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Claudio D’Addario
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Claudio D’Addario. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Claudio D’Addario based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Claudio D’Addario. Claudio D’Addario is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 0 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 0 | |
| 5 | 0 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 9 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 11 | |
| 11 | 2 | |
| 12 | 13 | |
| 13 | 5 | |
| 14 | 13 | |
| 15 | 14 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 20 | |
| 18 | 21 | |
| 19 | 30 | |
| 20 | 31 |
About Claudio D’Addario
Claudio D’Addario is a scholar working on Biological Psychiatry, Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems, having authored 128 papers that have together received 2.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Epigenetics and DNA Methylation (27 papers), Cannabis and Cannabinoid Research (27 papers) and Neurotransmitter Receptor Influence on Behavior (22 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (205 citations), Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience (955 citations) and Endocrine and Autonomic Systems (251 citations). Claudio D’Addario has collaborated with scholars based in Italy, Sweden and United States. Frequent co-authors include Mauro Maccarrone, Mariangela Pucci, Andrea Di Francesco, Patrizia Romualdi, Sanzio Candeletti, Maria Vittoria Micioni Di Bonaventura, Bernardo Dell’Osso, Carlo Cifani, Manuela Di Benedetto and Beatrice Arosio. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Neuroscience, PLoS ONE and Scientific Reports.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.