Lisette Ibanez
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law top 0.5%
- Marketing top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science top 5%
- Economics and Econometrics top 5%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Co-authors
- Gilles GrolleauKatherine FarrowSophie ClotSébastien RousselNaoufel MzoughiNathalie LavoieSandrine CostaMario F. Teisl
- Topics
- Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (20 papers)Economic and Environmental Valuation (12 papers)Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (11 papers)
- Partner nations
- FranceUnited KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Lisette Ibanez
38 papers receiving 1.2k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
- Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law 593
- Marketing 501
- Sociology and Political Science 338
- Economics and Econometrics 231
- Applied Psychology 168
Countries citing papers authored by Lisette Ibanez
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisette Ibanez's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisette Ibanez with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisette Ibanez more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisette Ibanez
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisette Ibanez. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisette Ibanez. The network helps show where Lisette Ibanez may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisette Ibanez
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisette Ibanez. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisette Ibanez based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisette Ibanez. Lisette Ibanez is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | |
| 2 | 17 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 22 | |
| 6 | 7 | |
| 7 | 3 | |
| 8 | 2 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 27 | |
| 11 | Induction d'émotions et comportements pro-environnementaux dans le cadre d'un jeu du dictateur | 1 |
| 12 | 45 | |
| 13 | 7 | |
| 14 | 6 | |
| 15 | 2 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 16 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 95 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About Lisette Ibanez
Lisette Ibanez is a scholar working on General Decision Sciences, Safety Research and Marketing, having authored 41 papers that have together received 1.2k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Experimental Behavioral Economics Studies (20 papers), Economic and Environmental Valuation (12 papers) and Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (11 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Marketing (501 citations), Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law (593 citations) and General Decision Sciences (69 citations). Lisette Ibanez has collaborated with scholars based in France, United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Gilles Grolleau, Katherine Farrow, Sophie Clot, Sébastien Roussel, Naoufel Mzoughi, Nathalie Lavoie, Sandrine Costa, Mario F. Teisl, Anne Stenger and Philippe Delacote. Their work appears in journals such as PLoS ONE, Journal of Business Research and Energy Policy.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.