Anne Stenger

541 total citations
19 papers, 391 citations indexed

About

Anne Stenger is a scholar working on Economics and Econometrics, Global and Planetary Change and Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. According to data from OpenAlex, Anne Stenger has authored 19 papers receiving a total of 391 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Economics and Econometrics, 9 papers in Global and Planetary Change and 4 papers in Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law. Recurrent topics in Anne Stenger's work include Economic and Environmental Valuation (16 papers), Forest Management and Policy (9 papers) and Environmental Conservation and Management (4 papers). Anne Stenger is often cited by papers focused on Economic and Environmental Valuation (16 papers), Forest Management and Policy (9 papers) and Environmental Conservation and Management (4 papers). Anne Stenger collaborates with scholars based in France, Morocco and Denmark. Anne Stenger's co-authors include Jens Abildtrup, Serge Garcia, Søren Bøye Olsen, Patrice Harou, Ståle Navrud, Claire Montagné, Lisette Ibanez, François Colson, Anne Rozan and Claire Montagné-Huck and has published in prestigious journals such as Ecological Economics, Food Policy and Environmental and Resource Economics.

In The Last Decade

Anne Stenger

19 papers receiving 356 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Anne Stenger France 12 244 230 60 53 39 19 391
Richard Yao New Zealand 12 215 0.9× 250 1.1× 74 1.2× 33 0.6× 35 0.9× 28 458
Donald Dennis United States 8 256 1.0× 261 1.1× 54 0.9× 13 0.2× 29 0.7× 9 419
Tuija Lankia Finland 11 162 0.7× 181 0.8× 55 0.9× 81 1.5× 52 1.3× 21 338
David Scrogin United States 8 303 1.2× 137 0.6× 83 1.4× 13 0.2× 42 1.1× 15 431
Luis Santiago Puerto Rico 10 92 0.4× 109 0.5× 34 0.6× 108 2.0× 41 1.1× 32 303
Erkki Mäntymaa Finland 12 341 1.4× 389 1.7× 129 2.1× 56 1.1× 151 3.9× 25 605
Yohei Mitani Japan 10 291 1.2× 192 0.8× 85 1.4× 21 0.4× 82 2.1× 22 387
Michael J. Mortimer United States 10 81 0.3× 214 0.9× 40 0.7× 26 0.5× 51 1.3× 29 340
Peter Shannon United Kingdom 5 157 0.6× 143 0.6× 112 1.9× 31 0.6× 49 1.3× 7 327
Jeanne Dachary-Bernard France 10 174 0.7× 160 0.7× 94 1.6× 56 1.1× 112 2.9× 22 332

Countries citing papers authored by Anne Stenger

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Anne Stenger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Anne Stenger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Anne Stenger more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Anne Stenger

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Anne Stenger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Anne Stenger. The network helps show where Anne Stenger may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Anne Stenger

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Anne Stenger. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Anne Stenger based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Anne Stenger. Anne Stenger is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

19 of 19 papers shown
1.
Abildtrup, Jens, et al.. (2023). The role of mandatory and voluntary joint bidding in promoting efficiency in conservation auction. SPIRE - Sciences Po Institutional REpository. 1 indexed citations
2.
Frings, Oliver, et al.. (2023). Do individual PES buyers care about additionality and free-riding? A choice experiment. Ecological Economics. 213. 107944–107944. 7 indexed citations
3.
Jensen, Frank, Bo Jellesmark Thorsen, Jens Abildtrup, Jette Bredahl Jacobsen, & Anne Stenger. (2021). Designing Voluntary Subsidies for Forest Owners under Imperfect Information. Journal of Forest Economics. 37(1). 73–101. 3 indexed citations
4.
Nguyen‐Van, Phu, et al.. (2021). Farmers' preferences towards organic farming: Evidence from a discrete choice experiment in Northern Vietnam. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 1 indexed citations
5.
Abildtrup, Jens, et al.. (2020). Nudging Acceptability for Wood Ash Recycling in Forests: A Choice Experiment. Ecological Economics. 177. 106748–106748. 15 indexed citations
6.
Abildtrup, Jens, et al.. (2015). Influences of nonindustrial private forest landowners’ management priorities on the timber harvest decision—A case study in France. Journal of Forest Economics. 21(3). 152–166. 33 indexed citations
7.
Abildtrup, Jens, Søren Bøye Olsen, & Anne Stenger. (2014). Combining RP and SP data while accounting for large choice sets and travel mode – an application to forest recreation. Journal of Environmental Economics and Policy. 4(2). 177–201. 18 indexed citations
8.
Garcia, Serge, et al.. (2014). Econometric analysis of social interactions in the production decisions of private forest owners. European Review of Agricultural Economics. 41(2). 177–198. 14 indexed citations
9.
Abildtrup, Jens, Serge Garcia, Søren Bøye Olsen, & Anne Stenger. (2013). Spatial preference heterogeneity in forest recreation. Ecological Economics. 92. 67–77. 119 indexed citations
10.
Abildtrup, Jens, Serge Garcia, Søren Bøye Olsen, & Anne Stenger. (2012). Les déterminants de la valeur récréative des forêts : l’exemple de la Lorraine. Revue Forestière Française. 1 indexed citations
11.
Garcia, Serge, et al.. (2011). Valuing forest biodiversity through a national survey in France: a dichotomous choice contingent valuation. International Journal of Biodiversity Science Ecosystems Services & Management. 7(2). 84–97. 11 indexed citations
12.
Garcia, Serge, et al.. (2010). Incentive Contracts for Natura 2000 Implementation in Forest Areas. Environmental and Resource Economics. 46(3). 281–302. 22 indexed citations
13.
Garcia, Serge, Patrice Harou, Claire Montagné, & Anne Stenger. (2008). Models for sample selection bias in contingent valuation: Application to forest biodiversity. Journal of Forest Economics. 15(1-2). 59–78. 34 indexed citations
14.
Stenger, Anne, Patrice Harou, & Ståle Navrud. (2008). Valuing environmental goods and services derived from the forests. Journal of Forest Economics. 15(1-2). 1–14. 63 indexed citations
15.
Stenger, Anne. (2000). Experimental valuation of food safety. Food Policy. 25(2). 211–218. 15 indexed citations
16.
Ibanez, Lisette & Anne Stenger. (2000). Environment and Food Safety in Agriculture: Are Labels Efficient?. Australian Economic Papers. 39(4). 452–464. 16 indexed citations
17.
Rozan, Anne & Anne Stenger. (2000). Intérêts et limites de la méthode du transfert de bénéfices. Economie et Statistique / Economics and Statistics. 336(1). 69–78. 4 indexed citations
18.
Colson, François, et al.. (1996). La participation des agriculteurs à l'amélioration du paysage de bocage. Résultat d'une enquête auprès d'agriculteurs en Loire-Atlantique.. 19–26. 1 indexed citations
19.
Colson, François & Anne Stenger. (1996). Evaluation contingente et paysages agricoles. Application au bocage de Loire- Atlantique. AgEcon Search (University of Minnesota, USA). 39(1). 151–177. 13 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026