Lisa Di Lemma
- Clinical Psychology top 10%
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Matt FieldPaul ChristiansenAndrew JonesEric RobinsonCatrin Tudur SmithSarah J NevittKat FordKaren Hughes
- Topics
- Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers)Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers)Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Lisa Di Lemma
14 papers receiving 419 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Clinical Psychology 219
- Applied Psychology 167
- Cognitive Neuroscience 88
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 88
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 71
Countries citing papers authored by Lisa Di Lemma
This map shows the geographic impact of Lisa Di Lemma's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Lisa Di Lemma with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Lisa Di Lemma more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Lisa Di Lemma
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Lisa Di Lemma. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Lisa Di Lemma. The network helps show where Lisa Di Lemma may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Lisa Di Lemma
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Lisa Di Lemma. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Lisa Di Lemma based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Lisa Di Lemma. Lisa Di Lemma is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 12 | |
| 3 | 2 | |
| 4 | 5 | |
| 5 | 11 | |
| 6 | 73 | |
| 7 | 6 | |
| 8 | 7 | |
| 9 | Responding to Adverse Childhood Experiences: An evidence review of interventions to prevent and address adversity across the life course | 13 |
| 10 | 41 | |
| 11 | 19 | |
| 12 | 179 | |
| 13 | 46 | |
| 14 | 8 | |
| 15 | 10 |
About Lisa Di Lemma
Lisa Di Lemma is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Geriatrics and Gerontology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 433 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Behavioral Health and Interventions (6 papers), Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes (3 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (167 citations), Clinical Psychology (219 citations) and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (71 citations). Lisa Di Lemma has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Matt Field, Paul Christiansen, Andrew Jones, Eric Robinson, Catrin Tudur Smith, Sarah J Nevitt, Kat Ford, Karen Hughes, Mark A Bellis and Alisha Davies. Their work appears in journals such as Psychopharmacology, Frontiers in Psychology and Child Abuse & Neglect.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.