Fred D. Wright
Impact in
- Applied Psychology top 5%
- Behavioral Health and Interventions
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
- Psychotherapy Techniques and Applications
- Personality Disorders and Psychopathology
Papers in
-
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development 2
-
- Mental Health Research Topics 2
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 2
- Co-authors
- Cory F. Newman (2 shared papers)Bruce S. Liese (2 shared papers)Aaron T. Beck (3 shared papers)Dan J. Stein (1 shared paper)A T Beck (1 shared paper)Robert J. Berchick (1 shared paper)Ruth L. Greenberg (1 shared paper)Leslie Sokol (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease (1 paper)Psychotherapy (1 paper)Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy (1 paper)PubMed (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United StatesSouth Africa
In The Last Decade
Fred D. Wright
4 papers receiving 610 citations
Fred D. Wright's Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Applied Psychology 124
- Clinical Psychology 392
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 195
- Psychiatry and Mental health 118
- Epidemiology 244
Countries citing papers authored by Fred D. Wright
This map shows the geographic impact of Fred D. Wright's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Fred D. Wright with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Fred D. Wright more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Fred D. Wright
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Fred D. Wright. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Fred D. Wright. The network helps show where Fred D. Wright may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 10 scholars most cited alongside Fred D. Wright, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Cognitive Therapy of Substance Abuse Hit paper breakdown → | 1995 | 521 |
| 2 | Cognitive therapy of substance abuse: theoretical rationale. | 1993 | 122 |
| 3 | 1989 | 52 | |
| 4 | 1990 | 10 |
About Fred D. Wright
Fred D. Wright is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Infectious Diseases, Organic Chemistry and Surgery, having authored 4 papers that have together received 705 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers), Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (2 papers) and Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Applied Psychology (124 citations), Clinical Psychology (392 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (195 citations), Psychiatry and Mental health (118 citations) and Epidemiology (244 citations). Fred D. Wright has collaborated with scholars based in United States and South Africa. Frequent co-authors include Cory F. Newman, Bruce S. Liese, Aaron T. Beck, Dan J. Stein, A T Beck, Robert J. Berchick, Ruth L. Greenberg, Leslie Sokol, Arthur Freeman and Brad A. Alford. Their work appears in journals such as The Journal of Nervous and Mental Disease, Psychotherapy, Journal of Cognitive Psychotherapy and PubMed.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.