James Chandler
- Literature and Literary Theory top 1%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- History top 1%
- Anthropology top 5%
- Philosophy top 5%
- Co-authors
- Randall McGowenArnold I. DavidsonHarry HarootunianAnne JanowitzKevin GilmartinDavid V. ErdmanAdrian JohnsDon H Bialostosky
- Topics
- Historical and Literary Studies (3 papers)Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers)American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaThe Modern Language ReviewCritical Inquiry
- Partner nations
- United StatesUnited KingdomChina
In The Last Decade
James Chandler
25 papers receiving 335 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 83
- Literature and Literary Theory 245
- Sociology and Political Science 153
- History 137
- Anthropology 78
- Philosophy 66
Countries citing papers authored by James Chandler
This map shows the geographic impact of James Chandler's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by James Chandler with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites James Chandler more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by James Chandler
This network shows the impact of papers produced by James Chandler. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by James Chandler. The network helps show where James Chandler may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of James Chandler
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of James Chandler. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of James Chandler based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with James Chandler. James Chandler is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 1 | |
| 6 | 5 | |
| 7 | Romantic Metropolis: The Urban Scene of British Culture, 1780-1840 | 18 |
| 8 | 16 | |
| 9 | 12 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 146 | |
| 12 | 59 | |
| 13 | Scott and the Scene of Explanation: Framing Contextuality in 'The Bride of Lammermoor.' (Sir Walter Scott) (the Romantic Novel) | 1 |
| 14 | Questions of evidence : proof, practice, and persuasion across the disciplines | 136 |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1 | |
| 17 | 14 | |
| 18 | 1 | |
| 19 | 10 | |
| 20 | 2 |
About James Chandler
James Chandler is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, History and Anthropology, having authored 30 papers that have together received 591 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Literary Studies (3 papers), Literature: history, themes, analysis (3 papers) and American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (245 citations), History (137 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (57 citations). James Chandler has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and China. Frequent co-authors include Randall McGowen, Arnold I. Davidson, Harry Harootunian, Anne Janowitz, Kevin Gilmartin, David V. Erdman, Adrian Johns, Don H Bialostosky, Michael Ferber and Bradford K. Mudge. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, The Modern Language Review and Critical Inquiry.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.