Kathleen Coburn
- Literature and Literary Theory top 2%
- History top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Philosophy top 5%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Paul M. ZallG. N. G. OrsiniSamuel Taylor ColeridgeF. E. L. PriestleyEarl Leslie GriggsGeorge W. MeyerThomas McFarland
- Topics
- Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper)Literature: history, themes, analysis (1 paper)
- Journals
- The American Journal of PsychologyJournal of Aesthetics and Art CriticismThe Modern Language Review
- Partner nations
- Canada
In The Last Decade
Kathleen Coburn
20 papers receiving 237 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 58
- Literature and Literary Theory 190
- History 86
- Sociology and Political Science 63
- Philosophy 57
- Anthropology 44
Countries citing papers authored by Kathleen Coburn
This map shows the geographic impact of Kathleen Coburn's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kathleen Coburn with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kathleen Coburn more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kathleen Coburn
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kathleen Coburn. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kathleen Coburn. The network helps show where Kathleen Coburn may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Kathleen Coburn
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Kathleen Coburn. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Kathleen Coburn based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Kathleen Coburn. Kathleen Coburn is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 3 | |
| 4 | 26 | |
| 5 | In pursuit of Coleridge | 1 |
| 6 | The self conscious imagination: A study of the Coleridge notebooks in celebration of the bi-centenary of his birth 21 October 1772 | 1 |
| 7 | 4 | |
| 8 | 151 | |
| 9 | Coleridge : a collection of critical essays | 4 |
| 10 | 7 | |
| 11 | 3 | |
| 12 | 10 | |
| 13 | 14 | |
| 14 | 29 | |
| 15 | 28 | |
| 16 | 24 | |
| 17 | 2 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | Inquiring Spirit a Coleridge Reader | 3 |
| 20 | 0 |
About Kathleen Coburn
Kathleen Coburn is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Infectious Diseases and Organic Chemistry, having authored 23 papers that have together received 456 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Themes in Literature Analysis (1 paper) and Literature: history, themes, analysis (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Literature and Literary Theory (190 citations), History (86 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (36 citations). Kathleen Coburn has collaborated with scholars based in Canada. Frequent co-authors include Paul M. Zall, G. N. G. Orsini, Samuel Taylor Coleridge, F. E. L. Priestley, Earl Leslie Griggs, George W. Meyer and Thomas McFarland. Their work appears in journals such as The American Journal of Psychology, Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism and The Modern Language Review.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.