Michaël Moriarty

1.2k citations
38 papers · 200 · h-index 6

Impact in

Papers in

Michaël Moriarty

24 papers receiving 158 citations

Peers

Michaël Moriarty
Comparison fields: 5 of 76
  • History and Philosophy of Science 25
  • Philosophy 56
  • Theoretical Computer Science 4
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 32
  • Literature and Literary Theory 22
Replace Amy M. Schmitter with:
Amy M. Schmitter Canada
Bernard Bosanquet
Daniel M. Gross United States
Franklin Perkins United States
Kai Hammermeister United States
Charles Bambach France
François Dagognet France
Richard John Lynn Canada
S Christian
Angus Fletcher United States
Michaël Moriarty relative to Amy M. Schmitter Canada Amy M. Schmitter's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Amy M. Schmitter · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Michaël Moriarty

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Michaël Moriarty's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michaël Moriarty with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michaël Moriarty more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Michaël Moriarty

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michaël Moriarty. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michaël Moriarty. The network helps show where Michaël Moriarty may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 18 scholars most cited alongside Michaël Moriarty, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Michaël Moriarty Line = papers co-authored together Michaël Moriarty links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 38 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1
Meditations on First Philosophy: with Selections from the Objections and Replies
2008123
2 200110
3 20098
4 20118
5 19917
6 20066
7 20055
8 19943
9 19983
10 20152
11 19922
12 19922
13 20012
14 20032
15 19882
16 20201
17 19701
18 19951
19 20201
20 20141

About Michaël Moriarty

Michaël Moriarty is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology, Philosophy, History and Philosophy of Science and History, having authored 38 papers that have together received 200 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Historical and Literary Studies (10 papers), French Literature and Criticism (7 papers), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (5 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (4 papers), Rousseau and Enlightenment Thought (3 papers), Historical Art and Culture Studies (3 papers), European Political History Analysis (2 papers) and Religion, Gender, and Enlightenment (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in History and Philosophy of Science (25 citations), Philosophy (56 citations), Theoretical Computer Science (4 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (32 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (22 citations). Michaël Moriarty has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and South Sudan. Frequent co-authors include René Descartes, Lionel Gossman, Diego Arango, Patrick Brennan, Diana Knight, Andrea Foote, Bradley K. Googins, John Lyons, Alain Viala and Theresa O'Connell. Their work appears in journals such as French Studies, Paragraph, The Modern Language Review, Social Text and Nottingham French Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact