Line Dubé

3.5k total citations
12 papers, 785 citations indexed

About

Line Dubé is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology and Management Information Systems. According to data from OpenAlex, Line Dubé has authored 12 papers receiving a total of 785 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Communication, 5 papers in Social Psychology and 5 papers in Management Information Systems. Recurrent topics in Line Dubé's work include Knowledge Management and Sharing (5 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (3 papers). Line Dubé is often cited by papers focused on Knowledge Management and Sharing (5 papers), Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers) and Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (3 papers). Line Dubé collaborates with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Line Dubé's co-authors include Anne Bourhis, Réal Jacob, Guy Paré and Daniel Robey and has published in prestigious journals such as Communications of the ACM, MIS Quarterly and Journal of Management Information Systems.

In The Last Decade

Line Dubé

11 papers receiving 696 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Line Dubé Canada	9	326	176	158	150	144	12	785
Pak Yoong New Zealand	15	259 0.8×	182 1.0×	165 1.0×	72 0.5×	137 1.0×	50	743
D. Robey United States	7	271 0.8×	242 1.4×	174 1.1×	175 1.2×	118 0.8×	14	797
Richard E. Potter United States	11	197 0.6×	192 1.1×	227 1.4×	108 0.7×	120 0.8×	28	824
Nikhil Mehta United States	15	166 0.5×	142 0.8×	133 0.8×	125 0.8×	177 1.2×	49	649
Massimo Magni Italy	16	220 0.7×	273 1.6×	232 1.5×	97 0.6×	209 1.5×	36	999
Peggy M. Beranek United States	10	321 1.0×	215 1.2×	317 2.0×	102 0.7×	80 0.6×	15	762
Claire R. McInerney United States	11	229 0.7×	110 0.6×	67 0.4×	71 0.5×	152 1.1×	31	696
Masayo Fujimoto Japan	5	203 0.6×	237 1.3×	114 0.7×	120 0.8×	120 0.8×	7	583
John Storck United States	6	302 0.9×	153 0.9×	102 0.6×	45 0.3×	164 1.1×	7	726
Mark A. Serva United States	13	164 0.5×	384 2.2×	124 0.8×	98 0.7×	131 0.9×	32	946

Countries citing papers authored by Line Dubé

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Line Dubé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Line Dubé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Line Dubé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Line Dubé

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Line Dubé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Line Dubé. The network helps show where Line Dubé may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Line Dubé

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Line Dubé. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Line Dubé based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Line Dubé. Line Dubé is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

12 of 12 papers shown

1.

Dubé, Line, et al.. (2024). Teaching Innovations in Management Education Research Journals: Reflecting on JME’s Journey. Organizational Behavior Teaching Review. 49(3). 491–529.

2.

Dubé, Line. (2014). Exploring How IT Professionals Experience Role Transitions at the End of Successful Projects. Journal of Management Information Systems. 31(1). 17–46. 15 indexed citations

3.

Dubé, Line, et al.. (2012). An Agile Method, a Contractual Relationship, and Distance: A Triad of Challenging Conditions for a Successful System Development Project. Journal of Information Technology Case and Application Research. 14(4). 30–57. 1 indexed citations

4.

Bourhis, Anne & Line Dubé. (2010). ‘Structuring spontaneity’: investigating the impact of management practices on the success of virtual communities of practice. Journal of Information Science. 36(2). 175–193. 23 indexed citations

5.

Dubé, Line. (2009). Survivre aux paradoxes de l'équipe virtuelle. Gestion. Vol. 34(2). 75–83. 3 indexed citations

6.

Dubé, Line & Daniel Robey. (2008). Surviving the paradoxes of virtual teamwork. Information Systems Journal. 19(1). 3–30. 78 indexed citations

7.

Dubé, Line, Anne Bourhis, & Réal Jacob. (2006). Towards a Typology of Virtual Communities of Practice. Interdisciplinary Journal of Information Knowledge and Management. 1. 69–93. 197 indexed citations

8.

Dubé, Line, Anne Bourhis, & Réal Jacob. (2005). The impact of structuring characteristics on the launching of virtual communities of practice. Journal of Organizational Change Management. 18(2). 145–166. 169 indexed citations

9.

Dubé, Line & Guy Paré. (2003). Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices.. MIS Quarterly. 27. 597–635. 92 indexed citations

10.

Dubé, Line & Guy Paré. (2001). Global Virtual Teams. Communications of the ACM. 44(12). 71–73. 96 indexed citations

11.

Dubé, Line & Daniel Robey. (1999). Software stories: three cultural perspectives on the organizational practices of software development. 9(4). 223–259. 68 indexed citations

12.

Dubé, Line. (1998). Teams in packaged software development. Information Technology and People. 11(1). 36–61. 43 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact