Line Dubé

3.5k citations
12 papers · 785 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

Line Dubé

11 papers receiving 696 citations

Peers

Line Dubé
Comparison fields: 5 of 95
  • Communication 326
  • Computer Science Applications 111
  • Management Information Systems 150
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 114
  • Information Systems and Management 69
Replace Pak Yoong with:
Pak Yoong New Zealand
Nikhil Mehta United States
John Storck United States
Masayo Fujimoto Japan
Claire R. McInerney United States
Anca Metiu France
D. Robey United States
Richard E. Potter United States
Mario Schaarschmidt Germany
David K. Allen United Kingdom
Line Dubé relative to Pak Yoong New Zealand Pak Yoong's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.5×2.5×
Pak Yoong · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Line Dubé

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Line Dubé's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Line Dubé with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Line Dubé more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Line Dubé

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Line Dubé. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Line Dubé. The network helps show where Line Dubé may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 4 scholars most cited alongside Line Dubé, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Line Dubé Line = papers co-authored together Line Dubé links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

12 of 12 papers shown
#Work
1 2006197
2 2005169
3 200196
4
Rigor in Information Systems Positivist Case Research: Current Practices.
200392
5 200878
6 199968
7 199843
8 201023
9 201415
10 20093
11 20121
12 20240

About Line Dubé

Line Dubé is a scholar working on Communication, Social Psychology, Management Information Systems, Information Systems and Management of Technology and Innovation, having authored 12 papers that have together received 785 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Team Dynamics and Performance (5 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (5 papers), Outsourcing and Supply Chain Management (3 papers), Software Engineering Techniques and Practices (3 papers), Open Source Software Innovations (2 papers), Collaboration in agile enterprises (2 papers), Online and Blended Learning (1 paper) and Business Strategy and Innovation (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Communication (326 citations), Computer Science Applications (111 citations), Management Information Systems (150 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (114 citations) and Information Systems and Management (69 citations). Line Dubé has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Anne Bourhis, Réal Jacob, Guy Paré and Daniel Robey. Their work appears in journals such as Communications of the ACM, Organizational Behavior Teaching Review, Information Technology and People, Information Systems Journal and Journal of Information Science.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact