Linda Orr

24 papers receiving 495 citations

Peers

Linda Orr
Comparison fields: 5 of 67
  • Strategy and Management 255
  • Business and International Management 29
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 152
  • Marketing 124
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 88
Replace V. Kanti Prasad with:
V. Kanti Prasad United States
Elad Granot United States
Olukemi O. Sawyerr United States
Annick Van Rossem Belgium
Lee C. Simmons United States
Damien McLoughlin Ireland
Yizheng Shi Hong Kong
Carol Finnegan United States
Shaz Ansari United Kingdom
Alma Mintu‐Wimsatt United States
Linda Orr relative to V. Kanti Prasad United States V. Kanti Prasad's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
V. Kanti Prasad · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Linda Orr

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Linda Orr's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Linda Orr with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Linda Orr more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Linda Orr

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Linda Orr. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Linda Orr. The network helps show where Linda Orr may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 10 scholars most cited alongside Linda Orr, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Linda Orr Line = papers co-authored together Linda Orr links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 27 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 2010279
2 201067
3 200753
4 200836
5 200729
6 201019
7 198518
8 198618
9 199410
10 19797
11 20144
12 19934
13 19874
14 20133
15
A Test of the Validity of Hofstede's Cultural Dimensions
20053
16 19902
17 19942
18
Advanced Sales Management Handbook and Cases: Analytical, Applied, and Relevant
20112
19 19772
20 19912

About Linda Orr

Linda Orr is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Classics, Anthropology and Marketing, having authored 27 papers that have together received 572 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include French Literature and Criticism (4 papers), Customer Service Quality and Loyalty (4 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (4 papers), Consumer Behavior in Brand Consumption and Identification (3 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (3 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (3 papers), Cultural Differences and Values (2 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Strategy and Management (255 citations), Business and International Management (29 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (152 citations), Marketing (124 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (88 citations). Linda Orr has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Victoria D. Bush, Douglas W. Vorhies, Gregory M. Rose, Alan J. Bush, Stephen Bann, D. G. Charlton, Larry Shiner, Hans Kellner, Charles Rearick and David P. Jordan. Their work appears in journals such as History and Theory, The American Historical Review, Journal of Business Research, The Modern Language Review and Modern Language Quarterly.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact